[arrl-odv:25738] E&E Votes
Hi all: There are two issues before theBoard concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, DougRehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee thathe is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a reviewof the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidatefor election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee.You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated,one on each issue. We need to have a vote on whether ornot either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should bereviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no,then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Boardvotes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether amajority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&ECommittee after review. Therefore, I am asking that eachDirector vote on each of the following questions: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee finding Doug Rehman,K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman,K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt,W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No Doug has requested review by theBoard of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respondto ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to havethese two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over theweekend if possible. 73 Rick ...
As I am in a contested election, I will abstain on both issues. Dwayne Allen, WY7FD -----Original Message----- From: "Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: 9/23/2016 11:25 To: "arrl-odv@arrl.org" <arrl-odv@arrl.org> Subject: [arrl-odv:25738] E&E Votes Hi all: There are two issues before theBoard concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, DougRehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee thathe is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a reviewof the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidatefor election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee.You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated,one on each issue. We need to have a vote on whether ornot either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should bereviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no,then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Boardvotes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether amajority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&ECommittee after review. Therefore, I am asking that eachDirector vote on each of the following questions: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee finding Doug Rehman,K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman,K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt,W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No Doug has requested review by theBoard of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respondto ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to havethese two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over theweekend if possible. 73 Rick ...
I, Mike Lisenco N2YBB, vote as follows: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug Rehman, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? NO, NO, NO!!! 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt, W4OZK? NO, NO, NO!!! Mike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mike Lisenco, N2YBB Director, Hudson Division Chairman, ad hoc Legislative Advocacy Committee ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio™ 917-865-3538 n2ybb@arrl.org
W6RGG votes as follows: *1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug*Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>*, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes ___*X*____No* *2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, W4OZK? _______ Yes ____X_____No* On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
Hi all:
There are two issues before the Board concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, Doug Rehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee that he is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a review of the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidate for election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee. You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated, one on each issue.
We need to have a vote on whether or not either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should be reviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no, then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Board votes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether a majority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&E Committee after review.
Therefore, I am asking that each Director *vote on each* of the following questions:
*1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No*
*2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No*
Doug has requested review by the Board of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respond to ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to have these two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over the weekend if possible.
73 Rick
...
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
*1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes ___X__No* *2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, W4OZK? _______ Yes ___X____No*
73, Dale Williams WA8EFK
...
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
At 01:25 PM 9/23/2016, Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv wrote:
2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt, W4OZK? ____xx_____No
-- Tom ===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
Rick, Question 1. – NO Question 2. – NO Rod Blocksome, K0DAS Director ARRL Midwest Division From: Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:25 PM To: arrl-odv@arrl.org Subject: [arrl-odv:25738] E&E Votes Hi all: There are two issues before the Board concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, Doug Rehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee that he is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a review of the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidate for election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee. You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated, one on each issue. We need to have a vote on whether or not either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should be reviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no, then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Board votes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether a majority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&E Committee after review. Therefore, I am asking that each Director vote on each of the following questions: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug Rehman, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt, W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No Doug has requested review by the Board of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respond to ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to have these two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over the weekend if possible. 73 Rick ... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Mr. President: I vote no and no. 73 Kent KAØLDG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Roderick, K5UR via arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> To: arrl-odv@arrl.org Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:25:00 PM Subject: [arrl-odv:25738] E&E Votes Hi all: There are two issues before the Board concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, Doug Rehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee that he is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a review of the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidate for election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee. You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated, one on each issue. We need to have a vote on whether or not either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should be reviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no, then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Board votes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether a majority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&E Committee after review. Therefore, I am asking that each Director vote on each of the following questions: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug Rehman , K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman , K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt , W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No Doug has requested review by the Board of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respond to ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to have these two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over the weekend if possible. 73 Rick ... _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
I am very uncomfortable voting on such significant and precedence setting matters without hearing directly from Director Rehman. Voting without hearing both sides of an issue is contrary to common sense and fairness. And I agree that as a courtesy to a fellow Director, Director Rehman should be allowed to present his side of these matters. Tom - W3TOM _____ From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:25 PM To: arrl-odv@arrl.org Subject: [arrl-odv:25738] E&E Votes Hi all: There are two issues before the Board concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, Doug Rehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee that he is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a review of the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidate for election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee. You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated, one on each issue. We need to have a vote on whether or not either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should be reviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no, then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Board votes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether a majority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&E Committee after review. Therefore, I am asking that each Director vote on each of the following questions: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite> Rehman, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite> Rehman, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite> Sarratt, W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No Doug has requested review by the Board of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respond to ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to have these two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over the weekend if possible. 73 Rick ...
Mr Roderick Please record the following votes from the Central Division; 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee finding Doug Rehman,K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes ___X___No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman,K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt,W4OZK? _______ Yes ___X____NoRespectfully, Kermit A Carlson W9XA Director Central Division From: "Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> To: arrl-odv@arrl.org Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:25 PM Subject: [arrl-odv:25738] E&E Votes Hi all: There are two issues before theBoard concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, DougRehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee thathe is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a reviewof the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidatefor election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee.You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated,one on each issue. We need to have a vote on whether ornot either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should bereviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no,then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Boardvotes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether amajority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&ECommittee after review. Therefore, I am asking that eachDirector vote on each of the following questions: 1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee finding Doug Rehman,K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No 2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics andElections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman,K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt,W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No Doug has requested review by theBoard of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respondto ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to havethese two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over theweekend if possible. 73 Rick ... _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
At 01:25 PM 9/23/2016, Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv wrote:
1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>Rehman, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? ___xx___No
Plus, if he's ineligible for re-election, he's not eligible to continue as a Director for the same reasons. I think that would take a separate vote, -- Tom ===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
1) The concept of a group of politicians voting their opposition out of office for alleged blasphemy is not something that comes close to my concept of ethical behavior. I note that it is however, the method used very successfully by the Iranian Guardian Council. Consequently, I will go on record as voting to yes on item 1, review of the decision to finding Mr Rehman "ineligible for reelection." 2) With respect to the complaints against Mr Sarratt, it's not straightforward. If it is true that the Orlando Hamcation chairman asked that Sarratt remove the chairman's picture from campaign literature that seems to imply support for Sarratt's candidacy, it is beyond me that the E&E Committee did not also ask for its removal. However, my view is that he members in the Southeastern Division are the ones who should decide who represents them, not me, or some other group of directors. Consequently, I vote to not review the Committee's decision to allow Sarratt to run. 3) The concept of voting on issues without discussion does not come close to my concept of either fair play, good business practice, or ethical conduct. 4) The end results of this action is likely to surpass the League's recent success in its NTS activities. 72 (not a typo), Dick Norton, N6AA On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
Hi all:
There are two issues before the Board concerning decisions of the Ethics and Elections Committee. First, Doug Rehman asked for review per Bylaw 41 of the decision by the E&E Committee that he is not eligible for re-election (ODV:25723). Second, Doug requested a review of the determination by E&E that Greg Sarratt is qualified as a candidate for election (ODV:25724) based on a complaint Doug filed with the E&E Committee. You have received two reports from the E&E that CEO Gallagher circulated, one on each issue.
We need to have a vote on whether or not either or both of these decisions of the E&E Committee should be reviewed. There will be two separate votes. If a majority of the Board votes no, then the respective matter will be deemed concluded. If a majority of the Board votes yes, then on that respective matter we will proceed to decide whether a majority of the Directors wishes to reverse the decision of the E&E Committee after review.
Therefore, I am asking that each Director *vote on each* of the following questions:
*1. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee finding Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, ineligible for re-election? _______Yes _______No*
*2. Should the Board review the decision of the Ethics and Elections Committee regarding the ethics complaint by Doug Rehman <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, K4AC, requesting disqualification of Greg Sarratt <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>, W4OZK? _______ Yes _________No*
Doug has requested review by the Board of Directors and that the votes be recorded. Accordingly, please respond to ODV so your votes can be recorded by the Secretary. It is important to have these two issues resolved quickly so please try to vote sometime over the weekend if possible.
73 Rick
...
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (11)
-
Bob Vallio -
Dale Williams -
Dwayne Allen -
k5ur＠aol.com -
Kent Olson -
Kermit Carlson -
Mike Lisenco N2YBB -
Richard J. Norton -
Rod Blocksome -
Tom Abernethy -
Tom Frenaye