[arrl-odv:23501] Remote Stations
Jim, We have had extensive conversations about the remote operating issue in the PSC. Can you resend the attachment? It did not come through for me. Thanks! '73 de JIM N2ZZ From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Jim Pace K7CEX NW Division Director Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:52 PM To: ODV Subject: [arrl-odv:23500] Remote Stations Well, the discussions are heating up here in the NW as I assume they are in the rest of the Country. I don't recall anything on the ODV (but then I don't recall lots of things) Smile emoticon but I thought I'd share this article. 73 and good Hamming Jim Pace, K7CEX ARRL - The National Association for Amateur Radio Northwestern Division Director
To add to the debate on this subject, in recent conversations with Cross at FCC about the paper license docket, he noted that with respect to remote control operations, there is an FCC rule that requires posting of a copy of the license of the control operator at the transmitter. It is a rule which, Cross suggests, is not often followed in these new commercial remote control station contexts. More on this shortly. 73, Chris W3KD Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, James F. Boehner MD via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
Jim,
We have had extensive conversations about the remote operating issue in the PSC.
Can you resend the attachment? It did not come through for me.
Thanks!
’73 de JIM N2ZZ
From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Jim Pace K7CEX NW Division Director Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:52 PM To: ODV Subject: [arrl-odv:23500] Remote Stations
Well, the discussions are heating up here in the NW as I assume they are in the rest of the Country. I don't recall anything on the ODV (but then I don't recall lots of things) <image001.gif> but I thought I'd share this article. 73 and good Hamming
Jim Pace, K7CEX ARRL - The National Association for Amateur Radio Northwestern Division Director _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Hello Chris - What effect would the proposed discontinuation ofpaper licenses have on this detail? 73, Kermit W9XA From: Chris Imlay <w3kd.arrl@gmail.com> To: James F. Boehner MD <jboehner01@yahoo.com> Cc: ODV <arrl-odv@arrl.org> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 12:08 PM Subject: [arrl-odv:23514] Re: Remote Stations To add to the debate on this subject, in recent conversations with Cross at FCC about the paper license docket, he noted that with respect to remote control operations, there is an FCC rule that requires posting of a copy of the license of the control operator at the transmitter. It is a rule which, Cross suggests, is not often followed in these new commercial remote control station contexts.More on this shortly.73, Chris W3KD Sent from my iPhone On Nov 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, James F. Boehner MD via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: <!--#yiv0692660967 _filtered #yiv0692660967 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv0692660967 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv0692660967 #yiv0692660967 p.yiv0692660967MsoNormal, #yiv0692660967 li.yiv0692660967MsoNormal, #yiv0692660967 div.yiv0692660967MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", "serif";}#yiv0692660967 a:link, #yiv0692660967 span.yiv0692660967MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0692660967 a:visited, #yiv0692660967 span.yiv0692660967MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0692660967 span.yiv0692660967EmailStyle17 {font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;}#yiv0692660967 .yiv0692660967MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv0692660967 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv0692660967 div.yiv0692660967WordSection1 {}-->Jim, We have had extensive conversations about the remote operating issue in the PSC. Can you resend the attachment? It did not come through for me. Thanks! ’73 de JIM N2ZZ From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Jim Pace K7CEX NW Division Director Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:52 PM To: ODV Subject: [arrl-odv:23500] Remote Stations Well, the discussions are heating up here in the NW as I assume they are in the rest of the Country. I don't recall anything on the ODV (but then I don't recall lots of things) <image001.gif> but I thought I'd share this article. 73 and good Hamming Jim Pace, K7CEX ARRL - The National Association for Amateur Radio Northwestern Division Director _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Actually, Kermit, the FCC proposal to discontinue *routine *mailing of paper licenses to licensees in the Amateur Service will have no effect on the current regulatory obligation (Section 97.213(d)) to post a photocopy of the licensee's paper license copy at the transmitter of a ground-based station under telecommand. This is because the FCC proposal allows a licensee to, himself or herself, obtain a paper license by one of several means, one of which is to elect to receive FCC-generated paper licenses via U.S. Mail. And the cited rule requires only a photocopy anyway. 73, Chris W3KD On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Kermit Carlson <w9xa@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello Chris -
What effect would the proposed discontinuation of paper licenses have on this detail?
73, Kermit W9XA
------------------------------ *From:* Chris Imlay <w3kd.arrl@gmail.com> *To:* James F. Boehner MD <jboehner01@yahoo.com> *Cc:* ODV <arrl-odv@arrl.org> *Sent:* Saturday, November 15, 2014 12:08 PM *Subject:* [arrl-odv:23514] Re: Remote Stations
To add to the debate on this subject, in recent conversations with Cross at FCC about the paper license docket, he noted that with respect to remote control operations, there is an FCC rule that requires posting of a copy of the license of the control operator at the transmitter. It is a rule which, Cross suggests, is not often followed in these new commercial remote control station contexts. More on this shortly. 73, Chris W3KD
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, James F. Boehner MD via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
Jim,
We have had extensive conversations about the remote operating issue in the PSC.
Can you resend the attachment? It did not come through for me.
Thanks!
’73 de JIM N2ZZ
*From:* arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jim Pace K7CEX NW Division Director *Sent:* Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:52 PM *To:* ODV *Subject:* [arrl-odv:23500] Remote Stations
Well, the discussions are heating up here in the NW as I assume they are in the rest of the Country. I don't recall anything on the ODV (but then I don't recall lots of things) <image001.gif> but I thought I'd share this article. 73 and good Hamming
Jim Pace, K7CEX ARRL - The National Association for Amateur Radio Northwestern Division Director
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
-- Christopher D. Imlay Booth, Freret & Imlay, LLC 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011 (301) 384-5525 telephone (301) 384-6384 facsimile W3KD@ARRL.ORG
participants (4)
-
Chris Imlay -
Christopher Imlay
-
James F. Boehner MD -
Kermit Carlson