Hello Chris -

   What effect would the proposed discontinuation of

paper licenses have on this detail?

                          73, Kermit W9XA

---

From: Chris Imlay <w3kd.arrl@gmail.com>
To: James F. Boehner MD <jboehner01@yahoo.com>
Cc: ODV <arrl-odv@arrl.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 12:08 PM
Subject: [arrl-odv:23514] Re: Remote Stations

To add to the debate on this subject, in recent conversations with Cross at FCC about the paper license docket, he noted that with respect to remote control operations, there is an FCC rule that requires posting of a copy of the license of the control operator at the transmitter. It is a rule which, Cross suggests, is not often followed in these new commercial remote control station contexts.

More on this shortly.

73, Chris W3KD

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, James F. Boehner MD via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:

Jim,

We have had extensive conversations about the remote operating issue in the PSC.

 

Can you resend the attachment?  It did not come through for me.

 

Thanks!

 

’73 de JIM N2ZZ

 

From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Jim Pace K7CEX NW Division Director
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:52 PM
To: ODV
Subject: [arrl-odv:23500] Remote Stations

 

Well, the discussions are heating up here in the NW as I assume they are in the rest of the Country.  I don't recall anything on the ODV (but then I don't recall lots of things) <image001.gif> but I thought I'd share this article.  73 and good Hamming

 

Jim Pace, K7CEX
ARRL - The National Association for Amateur Radio
Northwestern Division
Director

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv