[arrl-odv:31383] K0BBC letter to the Ethics and Election Committee and Board
Thank you for overseeing a fair election. Having gone through two contested election cycles, I would like to share my thoughts on modernizing parts of the election cycle. The membership mailing list request process needs a 21st century overhaul. Get out of the label printing business. I would like to see the paper printout and self adhesive label options removed from the election label request form (example attached). The HQ staff has better things to do than print out labels. I recommend the only electronic file formats offered be Excel or comma delimited (CSV). I think I'm too young to know what the QCQ format is. My opponent used a professional direct mail marketing company to produce and distribute his campaign literature and I think this will be the norm, by well funded elections, going forward. Candidates provide the excel or CSV file, along with their letter, to the printing company and the pros take it from there. Electrons vs paper. I would like to see the candidates nomination form and election label request form be online forms. COVID-19 made it a bit awkward to collect paper nomination signatures. With an online form, the ARRL member could login to arrl.org, submit a call sign & name and click the "OK" button to nominate a candidate. This would reduce staff time vetting paper signatures because only ARRL members can login to arrl.org website and submit a nomination. The election label request form is also worthy to be replaced by an online form. I paid about $8.00 for the mailing list. Is it worth the HQ staff time to collect the fee? The FCC discovered the vanity call sign fee collection was costing them more money than they were collecting and dropped the fee. I would like to see the ARRL drop the electronic mailing list fee altogether. One less fee might entice less affluent members to run for office. Email addresses. Why aren't email addresses included in the membership roster provided to candidates? It is an empty column in the Excel file provided to me. An email message is a less expensive way to communicate with the membership and the way most business communication is conducted in the 21st century. Perhaps a less expensive way for candidates to contact the members would entice more women, minorities and younger tech-savvy members to run for office? Paper Ballots. Stick with paper ballots. Paper is king. It's going to take a while before most ARRL members are going to participate in the electronic balloting process. Election cycle duration. Could a few weeks be chopped off the back end of the calendar? 45 days is more than enough time for most members to submit a ballot and enough time for most members to request a ballot, should they not receive one, and cast their vote. I suspect some component of the director election schedule is interwoven with the section manager election schedule, so I suspect nothing will change here. Respectfully Submitted, Matt Holden KØBBC
Hi Matt, I’m in agreement with the electronic stuff except for email. I think that there are legal and other reasons why email aren’t given out such as various laws around spam and the fact that people will unsubscribe or worse yet drop their membership if they get too much email. A better solution would be to allow candidates two chances to use a league operated email system to send out clearly labeled campaign messages. This way we aren’t giving out everyone’s email address and it’s limited in number. As far as electronic signatures go, we already do have that. Despite my attempt to amend the bylaws to officially code this failing, this is still implemented and practiced. Agreed on labels. All said thank you for serving on the Board and it’s been my pleasure working with you. I hope to work you on the air sometime. 73 Ria N2RJ On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:15 AM Matt Holden <mtholde@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for overseeing a fair election. Having gone through two contested election cycles, I would like to share my thoughts on modernizing parts of the election cycle.
The membership mailing list request process needs a 21st century overhaul. Get out of the label printing business. I would like to see the paper printout and self adhesive label options removed from the election label request form (example attached). The HQ staff has better things to do than print out labels. I recommend the only electronic file formats offered be Excel or comma delimited (CSV). I think I'm too young to know what the QCQ format is. My opponent used a professional direct mail marketing company to produce and distribute his campaign literature and I think this will be the norm, by well funded elections, going forward. Candidates provide the excel or CSV file, along with their letter, to the printing company and the pros take it from there.
Electrons vs paper. I would like to see the candidates nomination form and election label request form be online forms. COVID-19 made it a bit awkward to collect paper nomination signatures. With an online form, the ARRL member could login to arrl.org, submit a call sign & name and click the "OK" button to nominate a candidate. This would reduce staff time vetting paper signatures because only ARRL members can login to arrl.org website and submit a nomination. The election label request form is also worthy to be replaced by an online form. I paid about $8.00 for the mailing list. Is it worth the HQ staff time to collect the fee? The FCC discovered the vanity call sign fee collection was costing them more money than they were collecting and dropped the fee. I would like to see the ARRL drop the electronic mailing list fee altogether. One less fee might entice less affluent members to run for office.
Email addresses. Why aren't email addresses included in the membership roster provided to candidates? It is an empty column in the Excel file provided to me. An email message is a less expensive way to communicate with the membership and the way most business communication is conducted in the 21st century. Perhaps a less expensive way for candidates to contact the members would entice more women, minorities and younger tech-savvy members to run for office?
Paper Ballots. Stick with paper ballots. Paper is king. It's going to take a while before most ARRL members are going to participate in the electronic balloting process.
Election cycle duration. Could a few weeks be chopped off the back end of the calendar? 45 days is more than enough time for most members to submit a ballot and enough time for most members to request a ballot, should they not receive one, and cast their vote. I suspect some component of the director election schedule is interwoven with the section manager election schedule, so I suspect nothing will change here.
Respectfully Submitted, Matt Holden KØBBC _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Matt, Thanks for your service to the League, and don't be a stranger. A direct mail piece for a one-time mailing costs about a dollar per piece, printed and mailed. This might be fine for the Dakota division with 2500 or so members, but Southeastern is 15,000 members. The marketing effectiveness of direct mail is abysmal, by the way, and I know the ARRL does a lot of it. What percentage of "birthday discounts" are redeemed? I agree with Ria - email disclosure would present a legal problem, but an ARRL sponsored "blind email" for candidates to reach out to members during a campaign should be provided to all qualified candidates. The candidates could send up to one email per week after qualifications are announced, to all members who have "opted-in" to ARRL Division Communication. Members could then "opt out" of campaign emails, in accordance with Federal law. No one "gets a list" and every candidate has an equal basis to reach potential supporters. Content could be monitored for ethics issues. It is plain to see how a commercial interest might want to help a Director get elected. The rumor mill is that contributions have been made to certain candidates, some into thousands of dollars. Certainly, we have heard these rumors - members have complained to me about them. Our tradition is that ARRL is truly independent - our members expect this. I would propose an ethics rule that: 1. The source of and amounts of campaign funds be disclosed via affidavit by each candidate by the date all ballots are due. 2. No funding from anyone except members and affiliated clubs within the Director's Division be accepted. 3. All campaign contributions more than $100 from any single entity be disclosed publicly, identifying the donor. Finally, no outside gift of equipment or services should be accepted by any Director or ARRL employee at any time. I was approached by two different vendors offering "special deals" when they spotted my badge at hamfests. Let's make sure that everyone understands that this isn't tenable. Thoughts about this? Can we discuss this here with an eye toward an agenda item for January? Mickey Baker, N4MB Palm Beach Gardens, FL *“The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead." Robert K. Greenleaf* On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:15 AM Matt Holden <mtholde@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for overseeing a fair election. Having gone through two contested election cycles, I would like to share my thoughts on modernizing parts of the election cycle.
The membership mailing list request process needs a 21st century overhaul. Get out of the label printing business. I would like to see the paper printout and self adhesive label options removed from the election label request form (example attached). The HQ staff has better things to do than print out labels. I recommend the only electronic file formats offered be Excel or comma delimited (CSV). I think I'm too young to know what the QCQ format is. My opponent used a professional direct mail marketing company to produce and distribute his campaign literature and I think this will be the norm, by well funded elections, going forward. Candidates provide the excel or CSV file, along with their letter, to the printing company and the pros take it from there.
Electrons vs paper. I would like to see the candidates nomination form and election label request form be online forms. COVID-19 made it a bit awkward to collect paper nomination signatures. With an online form, the ARRL member could login to arrl.org, submit a call sign & name and click the "OK" button to nominate a candidate. This would reduce staff time vetting paper signatures because only ARRL members can login to arrl.org website and submit a nomination. The election label request form is also worthy to be replaced by an online form. I paid about $8.00 for the mailing list. Is it worth the HQ staff time to collect the fee? The FCC discovered the vanity call sign fee collection was costing them more money than they were collecting and dropped the fee. I would like to see the ARRL drop the electronic mailing list fee altogether. One less fee might entice less affluent members to run for office.
Email addresses. Why aren't email addresses included in the membership roster provided to candidates? It is an empty column in the Excel file provided to me. An email message is a less expensive way to communicate with the membership and the way most business communication is conducted in the 21st century. Perhaps a less expensive way for candidates to contact the members would entice more women, minorities and younger tech-savvy members to run for office?
Paper Ballots. Stick with paper ballots. Paper is king. It's going to take a while before most ARRL members are going to participate in the electronic balloting process.
Election cycle duration. Could a few weeks be chopped off the back end of the calendar? 45 days is more than enough time for most members to submit a ballot and enough time for most members to request a ballot, should they not receive one, and cast their vote. I suspect some component of the director election schedule is interwoven with the section manager election schedule, so I suspect nothing will change here.
Respectfully Submitted, Matt Holden KØBBC _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
I'm opposed to the proposed rule #2. I received external support from outside my division because my campaign focused on national issues. To use a Nortonism, we are not "super section managers." Having national support is not a bad thing. Even my opponent when he was campaigning on ARPA, cited interactions with hams in Florida instead of NY and NJ (we don't have as big of a HOA problem up here). There is something to be said about (against) the current model of bounding us to geographical divisions instead of being at large. Even worse for divisions like mine where one state is cut in half and I get only a small portion of the other. I hear from hams in South Jersey all the time, and I reluctantly turn them away and send them to Tom. (Tom has been rather gracious, however). It's especially ridiculous since the state house is in the Atlantic division, and I need to request permission to travel there when dealing with state officials such as my own elected state representatives who actually live near me. Come on. Proposed solutions to this have been less than optimal. For now, I think that anything to rigidly bind us to our divisions will be a non-starter. BTW I would eventually like to propose a bylaws amendment that we don't have to ask permission to travel to meet state Government officials in another division but in the same state. This would affect four divisions and three states (NY, NJ and CA). It just doesn't seem right that a director living out of state can say "no" to an ARRL representative living in her/his own state meeting state Government elected officials. "no outside gift of equipment or services should be accepted by any Director or ARRL employee at any time" - this seems like it's already the case. Even if it's not officially in the rules it's a big no-no. This seems like a bribe. Early on I gave back one campaign donation from an ARRL advertiser, because frankly he didn't know (and he's a friend). It's just not proper, and everyone's supposed to know this. 73 Ria, N2RJ On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 9:32 PM Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com> wrote:
Matt,
Thanks for your service to the League, and don't be a stranger.
A direct mail piece for a one-time mailing costs about a dollar per piece, printed and mailed. This might be fine for the Dakota division with 2500 or so members, but Southeastern is 15,000 members. The marketing effectiveness of direct mail is abysmal, by the way, and I know the ARRL does a lot of it. What percentage of "birthday discounts" are redeemed?
I agree with Ria - email disclosure would present a legal problem, but an ARRL sponsored "blind email" for candidates to reach out to members during a campaign should be provided to all qualified candidates.
The candidates could send up to one email per week after qualifications are announced, to all members who have "opted-in" to ARRL Division Communication. Members could then "opt out" of campaign emails, in accordance with Federal law. No one "gets a list" and every candidate has an equal basis to reach potential supporters. Content could be monitored for ethics issues.
It is plain to see how a commercial interest might want to help a Director get elected. The rumor mill is that contributions have been made to certain candidates, some into thousands of dollars. Certainly, we have heard these rumors - members have complained to me about them.
Our tradition is that ARRL is truly independent - our members expect this.
I would propose an ethics rule that:
The source of and amounts of campaign funds be disclosed via affidavit by each candidate by the date all ballots are due. No funding from anyone except members and affiliated clubs within the Director's Division be accepted. All campaign contributions more than $100 from any single entity be disclosed publicly, identifying the donor.
Finally, no outside gift of equipment or services should be accepted by any Director or ARRL employee at any time. I was approached by two different vendors offering "special deals" when they spotted my badge at hamfests. Let's make sure that everyone understands that this isn't tenable.
Thoughts about this? Can we discuss this here with an eye toward an agenda item for January?
Mickey Baker, N4MB Palm Beach Gardens, FL “The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead." Robert K. Greenleaf
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:15 AM Matt Holden <mtholde@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for overseeing a fair election. Having gone through two contested election cycles, I would like to share my thoughts on modernizing parts of the election cycle.
The membership mailing list request process needs a 21st century overhaul. Get out of the label printing business. I would like to see the paper printout and self adhesive label options removed from the election label request form (example attached). The HQ staff has better things to do than print out labels. I recommend the only electronic file formats offered be Excel or comma delimited (CSV). I think I'm too young to know what the QCQ format is. My opponent used a professional direct mail marketing company to produce and distribute his campaign literature and I think this will be the norm, by well funded elections, going forward. Candidates provide the excel or CSV file, along with their letter, to the printing company and the pros take it from there.
Electrons vs paper. I would like to see the candidates nomination form and election label request form be online forms. COVID-19 made it a bit awkward to collect paper nomination signatures. With an online form, the ARRL member could login to arrl.org, submit a call sign & name and click the "OK" button to nominate a candidate. This would reduce staff time vetting paper signatures because only ARRL members can login to arrl.org website and submit a nomination. The election label request form is also worthy to be replaced by an online form. I paid about $8.00 for the mailing list. Is it worth the HQ staff time to collect the fee? The FCC discovered the vanity call sign fee collection was costing them more money than they were collecting and dropped the fee. I would like to see the ARRL drop the electronic mailing list fee altogether. One less fee might entice less affluent members to run for office.
Email addresses. Why aren't email addresses included in the membership roster provided to candidates? It is an empty column in the Excel file provided to me. An email message is a less expensive way to communicate with the membership and the way most business communication is conducted in the 21st century. Perhaps a less expensive way for candidates to contact the members would entice more women, minorities and younger tech-savvy members to run for office?
Paper Ballots. Stick with paper ballots. Paper is king. It's going to take a while before most ARRL members are going to participate in the electronic balloting process.
Election cycle duration. Could a few weeks be chopped off the back end of the calendar? 45 days is more than enough time for most members to submit a ballot and enough time for most members to request a ballot, should they not receive one, and cast their vote. I suspect some component of the director election schedule is interwoven with the section manager election schedule, so I suspect nothing will change here.
Respectfully Submitted, Matt Holden KØBBC _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (3)
-
Matt Holden -
Mickey Baker -
rjairam＠gmail.com