Kermit: It does specifically target our allocation, albeit not in the initial spectrum group. Look at the bottom of page 9—3.1 GHz-3.550 GHz. Doug K4AC From: w9xa@yahoo.com [mailto:w9xa@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 9:22 AM To: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com>; arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill Hello Doug and Tom - One real issue is that there is incumbent use on some of the spectrum that is targeted that cannot easily be moved. Perhaps some of the other members of the ODV can comment on the present current uses and the impact that this proposal might have impact to military uses. While this Senate bill identifies a segment from 3550-3700 MHz for re-allocation, should the bill change and possibly identify a segment any lower than 3500 MHz then it would impact our allocation at 3300-3500 MHz. This will need to be watched closely. 73, Kermit W9XA _____ From: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com <mailto:doug@k4ac.com> > To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org <mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 8:11 AM Subject: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill <http://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/8805bde8-408f-4b5e-a5fa-d867eed9d84f/146C427A5D018C04CE7E9C925D398163.mobile-now-act.pdf> The Mobile Now Act is moving through the Senate. It is similar to legislation Rubio had filed in 2014 in that it seeks to make Federal spectrum available for next generation wireless services. While not in the initial proposed spectrum shift, the 3 GHz band is specifically targeted (see bottom of page 9) with a feasibility report on commercial access due 3 years after enactment of the Act. Doug K4AC _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org <mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

I checked with Fred Moorefield again this morning. While the news is not all bad, and some what was floated to him was much worse, I suspect we need to join him in worrying at least a little bit. I am not going to attempt to generate verbatim text resulting from the markup, because the GPO will catch up more efficiently than I can. But Section 3 of the base text that Director Rehman linked to this morning, while amended somewhat, stayed largely intact. Section 3 requires the Secretary of Commerce to prepare a report within 18 months (shortened from 3 years by Thune's manager's amendment) evaluating the feasibility commercial wireless services, licensed or unlicensed, to share all or part of the 3100-3550 MHz band. An amended subsection 3(d) provides that the reports and any segments identified as feasible for sharing would be put out for a period of public comment, rather than included in a report under the Spectrum Pipeline Act that would more likely put the identified bands on a fast track for auction. Subsection 3(c) requires the report to contain an assessment of impact on existing federal and non-federal users, as well as criteria necessary to ensure that existing federal and non-federal users are not subject to harmful interference. While the report is only required to assess the operations of federal entities in the band, I'm not sure how it can assess the impact and interference potential to non-federal users without also assessing the operations of non-federal users. If this becomes law, we'll have to work with our contacts at Commerce and DoD to get our stuff in, and I've already sought to have a discussion about this. Two things to note: 1) This has no discernible counterpart bill on the House side (yet). TKG may have a better feel for ow this might get to and progress through the other side, and whether we can and should seek an amendment there (keeping in mind that the Senate markup result is apparently much better than much of what DoD saw during discussions). 2) Unpassed legislation is subject to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: it is not possible to know both where it is and where it's going with precision. What got marked up yesterday could still change, for the better or for the worse. Then it could pass, or it could die. We'll be prepared for whatever happens. An upside to the markup result is that the millimeter wave segment of the bill leaves the 47 GHz band alone, despite it being identified for study and possible allocation to the mobile service at WRC-19. 73, Brennan T. Price, N4QX Chief Technology Officer American Radio Relay League PO Box 3470 Oakton VA 22124-9470 Tel +1 860 594-0247 ________________________________ From: arrl-odv [arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] on behalf of Imlay, Chris, W3KD Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 10:04 To: Rehman, Doug, K4AC Cc: Carlson, Kermit, W9XA; arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:25209] Re: 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill That segment has been in the National Broadband Plan since the initial list of target bands was created by NTIA and FCC. But that initial list, according to DoD, was created by some consultants without knowledge of current DoD deployments and we were told to not worry about that. We will of course check with Fred Moorefield again about this. Chris On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com<mailto:doug@k4ac.com>> wrote: Kermit: It does specifically target our allocation, albeit not in the initial spectrum group. Look at the bottom of page 9—3.1 GHz-3.550 GHz. Doug K4AC From: w9xa@yahoo.com<mailto:w9xa@yahoo.com> [mailto:w9xa@yahoo.com<mailto:w9xa@yahoo.com>] Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 9:22 AM To: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com<mailto:doug@k4ac.com>>; arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>> Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill Hello Doug and Tom - One real issue is that there is incumbent use on some of the spectrum that is targeted that cannot easily be moved. Perhaps some of the other members of the ODV can comment on the present current uses and the impact that this proposal might have impact to military uses. While this Senate bill identifies a segment from 3550-3700 MHz for re-allocation, should the bill change and possibly identify a segment any lower than 3500 MHz then it would impact our allocation at 3300-3500 MHz. This will need to be watched closely. 73, Kermit W9XA ________________________________ From: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com<mailto:doug@k4ac.com>> To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 8:11 AM Subject: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill <http://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/8805bde8-408f-4b5e-a5fa-d867eed9d84f/146C427A5D018C04CE7E9C925D398163.mobile-now-act.pdf> The Mobile Now Act is moving through the Senate. It is similar to legislation Rubio had filed in 2014 in that it seeks to make Federal spectrum available for next generation wireless services. While not in the initial proposed spectrum shift, the 3 GHz band is specifically targeted (see bottom of page 9) with a feasibility report on commercial access due 3 years after enactment of the Act. Doug K4AC _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv -- Christopher D. Imlay Booth, Freret & Imlay, LLC 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011 (301) 384-5525 telephone (301) 384-6384 facsimile W3KD@ARRL.ORG<mailto:W3KD@ARRL.ORG>

Without having accounted for the amendments, this seems an effort by some mobile interests to implement the global result of WRC-15 here in the United States, despite repeated representations by the US leadership that the outcome below 3550 MHz would not be implemented here. Below is the excerpt of my January report to the Board on this point: The outcome on our 3.3-3.5 GHz allocation saw about 30 countries (not including the United States, but including Mexico) identify the 3300-3400 MHz segment for IMT (modern cellular telephony and broadband data), and saw the 3400-3500 MHz segment identified for IMT worldwide, with language making it clear that these identifications do not preclude operation by other services to which the segments are allocated. While more sweeping than we had hoped (particularly in the 3300-3400 MHz range), the outcome doesn’t really change the status quo that has existed since 2007: maintaining amateur access to the 9 centimeter band is a country-by-country fight, and it is one in which we are holding our ground, at least in the United States. So we have to take up the fight in our country sooner than we had hoped (if the language in the base bill held, and my quick assessment is it did). Brennan T. Price, N4QX Chief Technology Officer American Radio Relay League PO Box 3470 Oakton VA 22124-9470 Tel +1 860 594-0247 ________________________________ From: arrl-odv [arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] on behalf of Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:38 To: Carlson, Kermit, W9XA; Rehman, Doug, K4AC; arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:25206] Re: 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill 3550-3700 MHz is a done deal. It has been the subject of FCC rulemaking for several years. Based on its inclusion in the NTIA’s 2010 Plan, the 3300-3500 MHz band was listed in the ARRL National Broadband Plan Committee report in January 2012 as the most vulnerable amateur allocation between 222 MHz and 3700 MHz. The Senate bill just provides some momentum behind studies that are already underway. Dave From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of arrl-odv Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:22 AM To: Rehman, Doug, K4AC; arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:25204] Re: 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill Hello Doug and Tom - One real issue is that there is incumbent use on some of the spectrum that is targeted that cannot easily be moved. Perhaps some of the other members of the ODV can comment on the present current uses and the impact that this proposal might have impact to military uses. While this Senate bill identifies a segment from 3550-3700 MHz for re-allocation, should the bill change and possibly identify a segment any lower than 3500 MHz then it would impact our allocation at 3300-3500 MHz. This will need to be watched closely. 73, Kermit W9XA ________________________________ From: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com<mailto:doug@k4ac.com>> To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 8:11 AM Subject: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill <http://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/8805bde8-408f-4b5e-a5fa-d867eed9d84f/146C427A5D018C04CE7E9C925D398163.mobile-now-act.pdf> The Mobile Now Act is moving through the Senate. It is similar to legislation Rubio had filed in 2014 in that it seeks to make Federal spectrum available for next generation wireless services. While not in the initial proposed spectrum shift, the 3 GHz band is specifically targeted (see bottom of page 9) with a feasibility report on commercial access due 3 years after enactment of the Act. Doug K4AC _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv