Kermit:
It does specifically target our allocation, albeit not in the initial spectrum group. Look at the bottom of page 9—3.1 GHz-3.550 GHz.
Doug
K4AC
From: w9xa@yahoo.com [mailto:w9xa@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 9:22 AM
To: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com>; arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill
Hello Doug and Tom -
One real issue is that there is incumbent use on some of
the spectrum that is targeted that cannot easily be moved. Perhaps
some of the other members of the ODV can comment on the
present current uses and the impact that this proposal might
have impact to military uses.
While this Senate bill identifies a segment from 3550-3700 MHz
for re-allocation, should the bill change and possibly identify a segment
any lower than 3500 MHz then it would impact our allocation at
3300-3500 MHz. This will need to be watched closely.
73, Kermit W9XA
From: Doug Rehman <doug@k4ac.com>
To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 8:11 AM
Subject: [arrl-odv:25199] 3 GHz Band in Sights of Senate Bill
The Mobile Now Act is moving through the Senate. It is similar to legislation Rubio had filed in 2014 in that it seeks to make Federal spectrum available for next generation wireless services. While not in the initial proposed spectrum shift, the 3 GHz band is specifically targeted (see bottom of page 9) with a feasibility report on commercial access due 3 years after enactment of the Act.
Doug
K4AC
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv