I assume this was sent to all Directors, as I received a copy addressed similarly. It is in your rights as a Director to comment publicly, but I suggest you might wait until a response, if any, is put out by California ARRL and/or HQ. I listened to the self-described "Comedy Ham Radio Show." Initial executive summary follows: 1) A local problem with a repeater site in northern California was brought up. 2) ARRL suggested an approach. 3) The locals did exactly what the ARRL suggested. 4) The potential problem appears to likely be resolving itself. 5) The ARRL is now at fault for not doing the suggested local-level work, and effectively forcing those locals involved to do it themselves. 73, Dick, N6AA On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 9:42 AM rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
Presumably this is from the Idaho section. I have no idea who he sent this to other than me.
N2RJ
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: ARRL ID Section <arrl.idaho@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:32 PM Subject: The CAL FIRE Ham Radio Update & Interview. The Facts Revealed To: <n2rj@arrl.org>
The questions raised about the ARRL in this video and many more have repeatedly come up in several different ways in recent times. It doesn't matter if it's about Winlink, or California hams, the actions and comments of the ARRL do not go unnoticed.
The CAL FIRE Ham Radio Update & Interview. The Facts Revealed <https://youtu.be/LHzyk457zIM>
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
