I believe Dale is correct in his concern about the arbitrary pressure imposed by the shortened meeting time. Although Mike is right to consider the cost savings, the possible harm is too great. Here's hoping we do get to have the First Meeting in Hartford. 73, Bob W6RGG On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 2:11 PM Dale Williams <dale.wms1@frontier.com> wrote:
Hi Mike,
I think we all can appreciate the desire to save a few bucks on a meeting room, but I believe there is far more value in not placing a time limit on the respective meetings. I encourage each of our Standing Committees to use the necessary time to complete all of their business without arbitrary pressure imposed by needing to vacate the room for the next meeting.
73,
Dale WA8EFK
On 10/27/2021 1:56 PM, Michael Ritz wrote:
I received a e-mail from Chairman Hippisley of the EmComm/FS committee that they will not be holding a meeting at the January Board meeting. That leaves just the A&F and PSC for Standing Committee meetings on the Thursday, which I assume because of COVID restrictions will be at the hotel again.
The question is: Can A&F and PSC share the same conference room at the hotel to save the League some money? I would be willing to hold the PSC in the afternoon Thursday, after lunch, if A&F can squeeze their fray into the morning time-frame, before lunch. (Or the other way around, if the A&F crowd would rather sleep in.)
Will this work?
73; Mike W7VO
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing listarrl-odv@reflector.arrl.orghttps://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>