July 2008 - arrl-odv - reflector.arrl.org

RE: [arrl-odv:17006] Re: Draft Board Minutes
by Joel Harrison 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Greg, My recollection was that we would dispatch Chris to meet with FCC on this matter, if possible, or at least that is that is the instruction I have given him. I don't recall any action regarding a letter, but will confess my memory on this is matter may be a bit fuzzy. Joel -----Original Message----- From: Greg Sarratt [mailto:w4ozk@arrl.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:19 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:17006] Re: Draft Board Minutes At Minute 12, discussions concluded that ARRL send another letter to FCC addressing the conflicting FCC interpretations of how the Part 97 rules apply to D-STAR. 73, Greg Sarratt, W4OZK > > _____ > > From: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ [mailto:dsumner@arrl.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:42 PM > To: arrl-odv > Subject: [arrl-odv:16998] Draft Board Minutes > > > > Thanks mainly to Dave Patton, I am able to send you the DRAFT minutes of our > July 18-19 meeting. These are NOT ready for release. > > Please let me know of any desired changes and corrections. > > 73, > > David Sumner, K1ZZ > > Secretary > > <<2008 Second Meeting Minutes DRAFT 3.doc>> > >

1 0

[arrl-odv:17006] Re: Draft Board Minutes
by Greg Sarratt 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

At Minute 12, discussions concluded that ARRL send another letter to FCC addressing the conflicting FCC interpretations of how the Part 97 rules apply to D-STAR. 73, Greg Sarratt, W4OZK > > _____ > > From: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ [mailto:dsumner@arrl.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:42 PM > To: arrl-odv > Subject: [arrl-odv:16998] Draft Board Minutes > > > > Thanks mainly to Dave Patton, I am able to send you the DRAFT minutes of our > July 18-19 meeting. These are NOT ready for release. > > Please let me know of any desired changes and corrections. > > 73, > > David Sumner, K1ZZ > > Secretary > > <<2008 Second Meeting Minutes DRAFT 3.doc>> > >

1 0

[arrl-odv:17005] FINAL Board Minutes
by Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Thanks to everyone who assisted with the fine-tuning of the minutes overnight. While I am labeling these as "final" we can of course fix any egregious errors any time right up to the approval of the minutes at the 2009 Annual Meeting. 73, David Sumner, K1ZZ Secretary <<2008 Second Meeting Minutes FINAL.doc>>

1 0

[arrl-odv:17004] Re:RE: Draft Board Minutes
by Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Tnx Bruce. The additional language in Minute 16 includes an instruction to staff and it was read as part of the motion, so - while language on the yellow sheet that's labeled "rationale" is not included in the minutes - in this case I thought it definitely should be. Roger on Minute 36. I should have fixed that. Dave From: Bruce Frahm K0BJ [mailto:brucefrahmk0bj@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:45 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:16999] Re: Draft Board Minutes Minute 16: Subsequent to the stricken words, I believe, is some of the rationale language. It is actually helpful in clarifying the action but should it 'properly' be included? I don't have any qualms about including it (actually I support doing so)but was just curious... Minute 36: It is actually the Second meeting, correct? Nil other edits from here. Bruce K0BJ ________________________________ Upgrade Your Email - Click here! <http://promos.hotbar.com/promos/promodll.dll?RunPromo&El=&SG=&RAND=2230 8&partner=spamblockerutility>

1 0

[arrl-odv:17003] RE: [arrl-odv:16998] Draft Board Minutes
by Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Thanks, Kay. I'll spell it out. Dave From: Kay Craigie [mailto:n3kn@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:15 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:16998] Draft Board Minutes At Minute 21 and in the motion that was introduced at the meeting, W4ALT is termed the "ARRL Delaware Section PIO." The correct appointment for W4ALT is Public Information Coordinator (PIC). At the meeting I wondered if he's the Section PIC and not a local PIO but didn't want to say anything until I had a chance to check the Field Organization database and make sure. 73 - Kay N3KN

1 0

[arrl-odv:17002] Re:RE: Draft Board Minutes
by Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Tnx Greg. I've gone back and forth on how to deal with late arrivals and early departures. My rationale for not listing John Chwat at that point is that I have him leaving the meeting at the end of Minute 13, so if we say that we reconvened with all persons "as" hereinbefore mentioned, that should cover the fact that he wasn't there on Saturday. We have all those folks who came and went in the course of Minute 9; I don't want to have to list them all again as still not being there on Saturday morning. I'll come up with wording that's a bit clearer. 73, Dave K1ZZ From: K0GW [mailto:k0gw@arrl.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 7:41 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:17001] Re: Draft Board Minutes Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ wrote: Please let me know of any desired changes and corrections. Though perhaps a minor matter, I note that Minute 24 says "the Board reconvened with all persons present as hereinbefore mentioned." To be perfectly correct, this should read: "all but Mr. Chwat." -- 73, Greg, KØGW Vice Director, Dakota Division

1 0

[arrl-odv:17001] Re: Draft Board Minutes
by K0GW 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ wrote: > > Please let me know of any desired changes and corrections. > *Though perhaps a minor matter, I note that Minute 24 says "*the Board reconvened with all persons present as hereinbefore mentioned." To be perfectly correct, this should read: "all but Mr. Chwat." -- 73, Greg, KØGW Vice Director, Dakota Division

1 0

[arrl-odv:16999] Re: Draft Board Minutes
by Bruce Frahm K0BJ 22 Jul '08

22 Jul '08

Draft Board MinutesMinute 16: Subsequent to the stricken words, I believe, is some of the rationale language. It is actually helpful in clarifying the action but should it 'properly' be included? I don't have any qualms about including it (actually I support doing so)but was just curious... Minute 36: It is actually the Second meeting, correct? Nil other edits from here. Bruce K0BJ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: [arrl-odv:16998] Draft Board Minutes
by Kay Craigie 22 Jul '08

22 Jul '08

At Minute 21 and in the motion that was introduced at the meeting, W4ALT is termed the "ARRL Delaware Section PIO." The correct appointment for W4ALT is Public Information Coordinator (PIC). At the meeting I wondered if he's the Section PIC and not a local PIO but didn't want to say anything until I had a chance to check the Field Organization database and make sure. 73 - Kay N3KN

1 0

[arrl-odv:16998] Draft Board Minutes
by Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ 22 Jul '08

22 Jul '08

Thanks mainly to Dave Patton, I am able to send you the DRAFT minutes of our July 18-19 meeting. These are NOT ready for release. Please let me know of any desired changes and corrections. 73, David Sumner, K1ZZ Secretary <<2008 Second Meeting Minutes DRAFT 3.doc>>

1 0