November 2005 - arrl-odv - reflector.arrl.org

[arrl-odv:13265] W2CE ex WB2DIN SK
by Frank Fallon 02 Nov '05

02 Nov '05

From: /"WX2NJ" <wx2nj(a)comcast.net>/ To: /"ARES Discussion Group" <OCARES(a)yahoogroups.com>/ Subject: /[Ocean County ARES] Bob Reed, W2CE/ Date: /Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:29:16 -0500/ Arrangements as follows: Robert Reed, W2CE - Born 1950 Thursday, November 3, DeGraff Funeral Home in Lakehurst, 119 Union Street (732-657-7868). Hearse will be leaving at 10:30 AM for the burial. You may follow the hearse. No other services are to be held at DeGraff. Burial at 11:00 AM at the Ocean County Memorial Park (Church Road and Silverton Road). There will be a small service at the grave site. 73, Bob, WX2NJ (Amateur) PG00016133 (Commercial) Ocean County ARES® EC http://qsy.to/wx2nj Ocean County Assistant Skywarn Coordinator http://www.qsl.net/kc2elg/ Bayville, NJ Weather Updated Every 60 Minutes http://qsy.to/wxnj

1 0

[arrl-odv:13264] Re: As-filed comments in Docket 05-235, Refarming II
by W3KD＠aol.com 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

In a message dated 11/1/2005 3:47:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, w7oz(a)comcast.net writes: > I just finished your 92-page (I made the print large) comments to the FCC. > Masterful job. You were kind, politic, and polite and didn’t once tell the > FCC how stupid they were (at least not in so many words). Thanks. Thanks, Greg. I perhaps should have made the print large so that it was 92 pages long when I filed it. Maybe they would then read it. This was a collaborative job, and Dave Sumner made a really bad draft of mine into a good end product. I had, in fact, told the FCC how stupid they were. Dave created some restraint where none had existed previously. I'll get him for that. 73, Chris W3KD

1 0

[arrl-odv:13263] Re: As-filed comments in Docket 05-235, Refarming II
by Greg Milnes 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

Chris I just finished your 92-page (I made the print large) comments to the FCC. Masterful job. You were kind, politic, and polite and didn't once tell the FCC how stupid they were (at least not in so many words). Thanks. 73/Greg W7OZ _____ From: W3KD(a)aol.com [mailto:W3KD@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 7:24 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:13261] As-filed comments in Docket 05-235, Refarming II Greetings. I tried to send this yesterday but the server bounced it. This is the word version of these comments, filed electronically October 31, the due date. I filed this as a PDF, with the Walden/Ross letter attached, but the file is too large to send through the ARRL server. The as-filed version can be read on the FCC's ECFS site under the "05-235" docket entry. Most of the comments filed so far (a total of about 3500 on both the petitions and the NPRM) were from individuals. It is not clear so far that filing reply comments will be necessary. We will see what shows up in the ECFS shortly. Reply comments are due November 14. Let me know any questions you have. 73, Chris W3KD

1 0

[arrl-odv:13262] EC Minutes, October 22
by Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

Here are the minutes of the October 22 EC Meeting. David Sumner, K1ZZ Secretary <<ecmin478.doc>>

1 0

[arrl-odv:13261] As-filed comments in Docket 05-235, Refarming II
by W3KD＠aol.com 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

Greetings. I tried to send this yesterday but the server bounced it. This is the word version of these comments, filed electronically October 31, the due date. I filed this as a PDF, with the Walden/Ross letter attached, but the file is too large to send through the ARRL server. The as-filed version can be read on the FCC's ECFS site under the "05-235" docket entry. Most of the comments filed so far (a total of about 3500 on both the petitions and the NPRM) were from individuals. It is not clear so far that filing reply comments will be necessary. We will see what shows up in the ECFS shortly. Reply comments are due November 14. Let me know any questions you have. 73, Chris W3KD

1 0