[arrl-odv:22062] Changes in Repeater Directory data collection
On my last post, I forgot to add another problem. SERA (SouthEastern Repeater Association) is in the red -1,155.73. ARRL Fees gave them an "other" income of $3,341.00. That income is sorely needed by the organization. It should give them an incentive to provide data that is acceptable with all ARRL conditions. '73 de JIM N2ZZ -----Original Message----- From: arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Jim Millsap wb4nws Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 9:10 PM To: G Widin Cc: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:22061] Re: Changes in Repeater Directory data collection Repeater journals make enough off of membership fees, ex: $20-30 per year, so I would prefer data sent straight to ARRL for more accurate reporting. Might generate more ARRL membership if individual owners sent their repeater data in. Jim Millsap Southeastern Vice-Director Sent from my iPhone-Jim Millsap On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:39 PM, G Widin <gpwidin@comcast.net> wrote:
I should perhaps clarify that my reply to Dave's original note assumed that those currently receiving the $ for submitting repeater info would likely not be mollified by the provision to pay them if correct data are received. 73, Greg
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Maybe SERA needs to cut travel expenses with out of town meetings:) time to tighten up or be like our government spending. Sent from my iPhone-Jim Millsap On Nov 3, 2013, at 9:26 PM, "James F. Boehner MD" <jboehner01@yahoo.com> wrote:
On my last post, I forgot to add another problem. SERA (SouthEastern Repeater Association) is in the red -1,155.73.
ARRL Fees gave them an "other" income of $3,341.00. That income is sorely needed by the organization. It should give them an incentive to provide data that is acceptable with all ARRL conditions.
'73 de JIM N2ZZ
-----Original Message----- From: arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Jim Millsap wb4nws Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 9:10 PM To: G Widin Cc: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:22061] Re: Changes in Repeater Directory data collection
Repeater journals make enough off of membership fees, ex: $20-30 per year, so I would prefer data sent straight to ARRL for more accurate reporting. Might generate more ARRL membership if individual owners sent their repeater data in. Jim Millsap Southeastern Vice-Director
Sent from my iPhone-Jim Millsap
On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:39 PM, G Widin <gpwidin@comcast.net> wrote:
I should perhaps clarify that my reply to Dave's original note assumed that those currently receiving the $ for submitting repeater info would likely not be mollified by the provision to pay them if correct data are received. 73, Greg
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (2)
-
James F. Boehner MD -
Jim Millsap wb4nws