[arrl-odv:20191] US proposal for AI 1.23
Here is the United States proposal for an amateur secondary allocation of 461-469 kHz and 471-478 kHz. While we knew it was coming, it's always nice to see it in print as an official ITU conference document. I don't know if the reference to 471-487 kHz at the bottom of page 1 is a typo; Brennan may be able to comment. It's not substantive but I would guess 471-478 kHz was intended. Dave K1ZZ _______________________________________________ iaru-wrc mailing list iaru-wrc@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/iaru-wrc
The reference to 461-487 kHz is a typo, which has been pointed out to the United States by yours truly several times and has been corrected in the CITEL Inter-American Proposal. Since the typo actually admits a low NDB density in a slightly more favorable frequency range, I don't see a need to correct them further. --Brennan ________________________________ From: arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org on behalf of Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ Sent: Tue 8/30/2011 9:53 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:20191] US proposal for AI 1.23 Here is the United States proposal for an amateur secondary allocation of 461-469 kHz and 471-478 kHz. While we knew it was coming, it's always nice to see it in print as an official ITU conference document. I don't know if the reference to 471-487 kHz at the bottom of page 1 is a typo; Brennan may be able to comment. It's not substantive but I would guess 471-478 kHz was intended. Dave K1ZZ
Dave, Is the information contained in the AT 1.23 proposal public? Also is it supported by IARU in general? Tnx, Jim Jim Weaver, K8JE Director, Great Lakes Division 5065 Bethany Rd. Mason, OH 45040 Tel. 513-459-1661; e-mail K8JE@arrl.org ARRL: The reason Amateur Radio Is Members: The reason ARRL is _____ From: arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ Sent: 30 August, 2011 9:54 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:20191] US proposal for AI 1.23 Here is the United States proposal for an amateur secondary allocation of 461-469 kHz and 471-478 kHz. While we knew it was coming, it's always nice to see it in print as an official ITU conference document. I don't know if the reference to 471-487 kHz at the bottom of page 1 is a typo; Brennan may be able to comment. It's not substantive but I would guess 471-478 kHz was intended. Dave K1ZZ
Jim, the fact that the US supports this method of satisfying Agenda Item (AI) 1.23 has been public information since last September. See http://www.arrl.org/news/united-states-supports-secondary-amateur-radio- allocation-at-461-469-and-471-478-khz. All that's happened now is that the US has formally submitted the proposal for consideration at the WRC. This is so-called Method B in the CPM Report (see http://www.arrl.org/news/amateur-mf-allocation-moves-a-step-closer). The IARU would prefer Method A but will be satisfied with any solution that provides an allocation with sufficient bandwidth to be useful. Dave From: Jim Weaver K8JE [mailto:K8JE@arrl.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 4:44 PM To: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ; arrl-odv Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:20191] US proposal for AI 1.23 Dave, Is the information contained in the AT 1.23 proposal public? Also is it supported by IARU in general? Tnx, Jim Jim Weaver, K8JE Director, Great Lakes Division 5065 Bethany Rd. Mason, OH 45040 Tel. 513-459-1661; e-mail K8JE@arrl.org ARRL: The reason Amateur Radio Is Members: The reason ARRL is ________________________________ From: arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ Sent: 30 August, 2011 9:54 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:20191] US proposal for AI 1.23 Here is the United States proposal for an amateur secondary allocation of 461-469 kHz and 471-478 kHz. While we knew it was coming, it's always nice to see it in print as an official ITU conference document. I don't know if the reference to 471-487 kHz at the bottom of page 1 is a typo; Brennan may be able to comment. It's not substantive but I would guess 471-478 kHz was intended. Dave K1ZZ
participants (4)
-
Gary Johnston -
Jim Weaver K8JE -
Price, Brennan, N4QX -
Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ