I wonder if they could direct COMTek to do that for them, in which case we need to examine the results very carefully. This movement from the FCC is encouraging but we can still get blown off by all these guys with fuzzy data. I would sure want to see a "PE" after somebody's name on that report. 73, Wade W0EJ -----Original Message----- From: Joel Harrison [mailto:w5zn@arrl.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 12:08 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:13864] FCC Action - BPL Interference Complaint-Manassas, VA Exactly! My opinion is that in order for them to supply the info requested by FCC they will have to invest extra time of their own contract it out, which in turn will increase their costs. If they have to expend this effort in each and every case, maybe they will sit back and reassess whether it is cost effective for them to continue with the current configuration. Joel -----Original Message----- From: Wade [mailto:walstrom@mchsi.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:47 AM To: 'Joel Harrison'; 'arrl-odv' Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:13864] FCC Action - BPL Interference Complaint-Manassas, VA It will be interesting to see what the City of Manassas comes up with for measurements as I doubt the City has the technical competence available to do this on their own. 73, Wade W0EJ