[arrl-odv:19641] Re: QST Demos - More

The more the merrier. I have certainly seen cases where such experts do not agree. They usually agree on what's awful, not as much about what is best. I was concerned that we'd not have any human factors evaluation at all. More is better, to me. -- 73, Greg, KØGW Director, Dakota Division ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kay Craigie" <n3kn@verizon.net> To: "arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:43:11 PM Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:19638] Re: QST Demos - More Not sure I'd hire any expert on Fathom's say-so, but the idea of a human factors review makes some sense to me. What if we could find two or three professionals in that field who are League members and might do the evaluations pro bono? If we were going to do it, I'd kinda like us to have more than one evaluation to consider. 73 - Kay N3KN
participants (1)
-
G.P. Widin