QSL Brian. Dave and I agree that the response should be worded such that Rich will come to his own realization that he really goofed on a couple of points. Wording it differently would serve no purpose but to encourage Rich to write yet another bad editorial, which ARRL and amateur radio doesn't need. Joel _____ From: Brian Mileshosky [mailto:n5zgt@swcp.com] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 11:17 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: RE: December CQ editorial Joel - Rich's column may be named "Zero Bias," but it'd be better off called "Zero self-research" (a fitting description for much of today's media). I look forward to reading Dave's reply. If Rich didn't have a certain anatomical feature or the courtesy of first inquiring with the League for a bit of fact checking, I hope that Dave calls him out on that as part of his response. 73, Brian N5ZGT _____ From: Joel Harrison [mailto:w5zn@arrl.org] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 6:43 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: December CQ editorial For those of you that subscribe to CQ, you will see Rich Moseson's editorial in the December issue. For those like me that don't, it is attached. It is unfortunate that Rich has chosen to fill his editorial with writing based on blatantly false statements and rumors. Dave will be crafting a response next week. 73 Joel W5ZN