[ARRL-ODV:9664] Re Re Confidential re ARRLv FCC, United States District Court , District of Columbia

28 Oct
2003
28 Oct
'03
8:58 p.m.
Chris: Good point. If it was an argument it was force of habit. Actually I was just looking to be convinced we werent looking down a large hole before proceeding. 73, Jay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In a message dated 10/28/2003 2:19:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, jbellows@skypoint.com writes: 6. There is no indication that the ISM community is inclined to Petition for Review of this action. Jay, the above is the only red herring in your argument; ISM devices are in general RF emitters (e.g. RF light bulbs, arc welders, etc), and therefore not subject themselves to RFI. You won't hear from them about RFI from Part 15 devices or anything else. Chris
7806
Age (days ago)
7806
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
John Bellows