[arrl-odv:30616] Re: [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
Rick: I concur; I believe that an article about holding a video conference, motions approved to date and the fact that we recessed would be in order. 73, Jeff, K0RM -------- Original Message -------- From: k5ur--- via exec-com <exec-com@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Sun Jul 19 14:34:32 MDT 2020 To: "david@davidsiddall-law.com" <david@davidsiddall-law.com>, "exec-com@arrl.org" <exec-com@arrl.org> Subject: [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting Dave and all: Thanks for the nice comments about the meeting. It would be good for us to say something about the meeting even though we are recessed and minutes will not be approved until we conclude. Also, it would be good for Dave to be able to inform the FCC about the band plan as that was information the FCC wanted. We really need the FCC to get moving on our proceedings. I've asked Barry to check with Spinella, but I wonder if we could have Rick Lindquist craft a very brief article of the actions thus far. We will be getting questions from members so we need to be prepared to say something besides "we can't talk about it." Comments? Rick -----Original Message----- From: david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> To: exec-com@arrl.org <exec-com@arrl.org> Sent: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 1:26 pm Subject: [exec-com:9596] Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting <!--#yiv2232341888 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv2232341888 #yiv2232341888 p.yiv2232341888MsoNormal, #yiv2232341888 li.yiv2232341888MsoNormal, #yiv2232341888 div.yiv2232341888MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv2232341888 p.yiv2232341888MsoListParagraph, #yiv2232341888 li.yiv2232341888MsoListParagraph, #yiv2232341888 div.yiv2232341888MsoListParagraph {margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv2232341888 .yiv2232341888MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv2232341888 div.yiv2232341888WordSection1 {}#yiv2232341888 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv2232341888 ol {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv2232341888 ul {margin-bottom:0in;}-->EC, Congratulations to Rick and Directors for a very well run meeting yesterday. With adoption of the band plan report, I am beginning to prepare the requisite FCC Petition for Rulemaking. A couple of questions related to this. - Do directors publicly discuss Board actions before release of the minutes, or generally are actions pretty held close to the vest until the minutes announce actions? - And second, will minutes of this portion of the meeting be released within the next several weeks , or will they be released only after the meeting is adjourned (maybe next month)? Thanks. Dave K3ZJ David R. Siddall Managing Partner DS Law, PLLC 1629 K St. NW, Ste 300 Washington, DC 20006 direct: +1 202 559 4690 Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited. This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you. _______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com
Agree we need SOMEthing out there! If there isn't at least an unofficial, informal summary of what we've done thus far that is issued quickly, there will be a firestorm from members and non-members alike! Bud, W2RU On Jul 19, 2020, at 4:45 PM, Jeff Ryan <k0rm@comcast.net> wrote: Rick: I concur; I believe that an article about holding a video conference, motions approved to date and the fact that we recessed would be in order. 73, Jeff, K0RM ________________________________ From: k5ur--- via exec-com Sent: Sun Jul 19 14:34:32 MDT 2020 To: "david@davidsiddall-law.com" , "exec-com@arrl.org" Subject: [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting Dave and all: Thanks for the nice comments about the meeting. It would be good for us to say something about the meeting even though we are recessed and minutes will not be approved until we conclude. Also, it would be good for Dave to be able to inform the FCC about the band plan as that was information the FCC wanted. We really need the FCC to get moving on our proceedings. I've asked Barry to check with Spinella, but I wonder if we could have Rick Lindquist craft a very brief article of the actions thus far. We will be getting questions from members so we need to be prepared to say something besides "we can't talk about it." Comments? Rick -----Original Message----- From: david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> To: exec-com@arrl.org <exec-com@arrl.org> Sent: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 1:26 pm Subject: [exec-com:9596] Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting EC, Congratulations to Rick and Directors for a very well run meeting yesterday. With adoption of the band plan report, I am beginning to prepare the requisite FCC Petition for Rulemaking. A couple of questions related to this. * Do directors publicly discuss Board actions before release of the minutes, or generally are actions pretty held close to the vest until the minutes announce actions? * And second, will minutes of this portion of the meeting be released within the next several weeks , or will they be released only after the meeting is adjourned (maybe next month)? Thanks. Dave K3ZJ David R. Siddall Managing Partner DS Law, PLLC 1629 K St. NW, Ste 300 Washington, DC 20006 direct: +1 202 559 4690 Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited. This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you. _______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:exec-com@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com ________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
I am in agreement! We need something out there informing the members. However, anything that passed technically can’t be enacted until we are adjourned if I am remembering correctly... Great meeting y’all! 73 David A. Norris, K5UZ Director, Delta Division Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 19, 2020, at 7:17 PM, Bud Hippisley <bud@w2ru.net> wrote:
Agree we need SOMEthing out there! If there isn't at least an unofficial, informal summary of what we've done thus far that is issued quickly, there will be a firestorm from members and non-members alike!
Bud, W2RU
On Jul 19, 2020, at 4:45 PM, Jeff Ryan <k0rm@comcast.net> wrote:
Rick:
I concur; I believe that an article about holding a video conference, motions approved to date and the fact that we recessed would be in order.
73,
Jeff, K0RM From: k5ur--- via exec-com Sent: Sun Jul 19 14:34:32 MDT 2020 To: "david@davidsiddall-law.com" , "exec-com@arrl.org" Subject: [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
Dave and all:
Thanks for the nice comments about the meeting.
It would be good for us to say something about the meeting even though we are recessed and minutes will not be approved until we conclude. Also, it would be good for Dave to be able to inform the FCC about the band plan as that was information the FCC wanted. We really need the FCC to get moving on our proceedings.
I've asked Barry to check with Spinella, but I wonder if we could have Rick Lindquist craft a very brief article of the actions thus far. We will be getting questions from members so we need to be prepared to say something besides "we can't talk about it."
Comments?
Rick
-----Original Message----- From: david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> To: exec-com@arrl.org <exec-com@arrl.org> Sent: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 1:26 pm Subject: [exec-com:9596] Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
EC,
Congratulations to Rick and Directors for a very well run meeting yesterday.
With adoption of the band plan report, I am beginning to prepare the requisite FCC Petition for Rulemaking.
A couple of questions related to this. Do directors publicly discuss Board actions before release of the minutes, or generally are actions pretty held close to the vest until the minutes announce actions? And second, will minutes of this portion of the meeting be released within the next several weeks , or will they be released only after the meeting is adjourned (maybe next month)?
Thanks.
Dave K3ZJ
David R. Siddall Managing Partner DS Law, PLLC 1629 K St. NW, Ste 300 Washington, DC 20006 direct: +1 202 559 4690
Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited. This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com
exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Hello Jeff et al, May I suggest that the term a “remote meeting held electronically” might be a better expression than “video conference”... We do need to make a statement including the plans to reconvene in about one one month. 73, Kermit W9XA Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, July 19, 2020, 15:45, Jeff Ryan <k0rm@comcast.net> wrote: #yiv0044620569 #yiv0044620569 -- filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 p.yiv0044620569MsoNormal, #yiv0044620569 li.yiv0044620569MsoNormal, #yiv0044620569 div.yiv0044620569MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv0044620569 p.yiv0044620569MsoListParagraph, #yiv0044620569 li.yiv0044620569MsoListParagraph, #yiv0044620569 div.yiv0044620569MsoListParagraph {margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv0044620569 .yiv0044620569MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 div.yiv0044620569WordSection1 {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 filtered {}#yiv0044620569 ol {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv0044620569 ul {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv0044620569 Rick: I concur; I believe that an article about holding a video conference, motions approved to date and the fact that we recessed would be in order. 73, Jeff, K0RM From: k5ur--- via exec-com Sent: Sun Jul 19 14:34:32 MDT 2020 To: "david@davidsiddall-law.com" , "exec-com@arrl.org" Subject: [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting Dave and all: Thanks for the nice comments about the meeting. It would be good for us to say something about the meeting even though we are recessed and minutes will not be approved until we conclude. Also, it would be good for Dave to be able to inform the FCC about the band plan as that was information the FCC wanted. We really need the FCC to get moving on our proceedings. I've asked Barry to check with Spinella, but I wonder if we could have Rick Lindquist craft a very brief article of the actions thus far. We will be getting questions from members so we need to be prepared to say something besides "we can't talk about it." Comments? Rick -----Original Message----- From: david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> To: exec-com@arrl.org <exec-com@arrl.org> Sent: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 1:26 pm Subject: [exec-com:9596] Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting EC, Congratulations to Rick and Directors for a very well run meeting yesterday. With adoption of the band plan report, I am beginning to prepare the requisite FCC Petition for Rulemaking. A couple of questions related to this. - Do directors publicly discuss Board actions before release of the minutes, or generally are actions pretty held close to the vest until the minutes announce actions? - And second, will minutes of this portion of the meeting be released within the next several weeks , or will they be released only after the meeting is adjourned (maybe next month)? Thanks. Dave K3ZJ David R. SiddallManaging PartnerDS Law, PLLC1629 K St. NW, Ste 300Washington, DC 20006direct: +1 202 559 4690 Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited. This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you. _______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
All I believe Kermit's "remote meeting held electronically" has more gravitas than "video conference". We did not have a conference; we held a meeting. I support Kermit's descriptor. _______________________________________ John Robert Stratton N5AUS Director West Gulf Division Office:512-445-6262 Cell:512-426-2028 P.O. Box 2232 Austin, Texas 78768-2232 *_______________________________________*** ** On 7/20/20 7:16 AM, Kermit Carlson via arrl-odv wrote:
Hello Jeff et al,
May I suggest that the term a “remote meeting held electronically” might be a better expression than “video conference”...
We do need to make a statement including the plans to reconvene in about one one month.
73, Kermit W9XA
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS>
On Sunday, July 19, 2020, 15:45, Jeff Ryan <k0rm@comcast.net> wrote:
Rick:
I concur; I believe that an article about holding a video conference, motions approved to date and the fact that we recessed would be in order.
73,
Jeff, K0RM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* k5ur--- via exec-com *Sent:* Sun Jul 19 14:34:32 MDT 2020 *To:* "david@davidsiddall-law.com" , "exec-com@arrl.org" *Subject:* [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
Dave and all:
Thanks for the nice comments about the meeting.
It would be good for us to say something about the meeting even though we are recessed and minutes will not be approved until we conclude. Also, it would be good for Dave to be able to inform the FCC about the band plan as that was information the FCC wanted. We really need the FCC to get moving on our proceedings.
I've asked Barry to check with Spinella, but I wonder if we could have Rick Lindquistcraft a very brief article of the actions thus far. We will be getting questions from members so we need to be prepared to say something besides "we can't talk about it."
Comments?
Rick
-----Original Message----- From: david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> To: exec-com@arrl.org <exec-com@arrl.org> Sent: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 1:26 pm Subject: [exec-com:9596] Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
EC, Congratulations to Rick and Directors for a very well run meeting yesterday. With adoption of the band plan report, I am beginning to prepare the requisite FCC Petition for Rulemaking. A couple of questions related to this.
* Do directors publicly discuss Board actions before release of the minutes, or generally are actions pretty held close to the vest until the minutes announce actions? * And second, will minutes of this portion of the meeting be released within the next several weeks , or will they be released only after the meeting is adjourned (maybe next month)?
Thanks. Dave K3ZJ *David R. Siddall* *Managing Partner* *DS Law, PLLC* *1629 K St. NW, Ste 300* *Washington, DC 20006* *direct: +1 202 559 4690* Default Line *Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited.* This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you. _______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org <mailto:exec-com@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org <mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Agreed on the terminology. This is an historic occasion in the annals of the ARRL - the first regular board meeting to be held using live video and audio for all participants. Although there are particular issues remaining to conclude the overall meeting, we should note this milestone for posterity. Rick Roderick did a stellar job managing the meeting despite "help" from folks like me who missed "unmuting" myself several times. 73, Mickey Baker, N4MB Palm Beach Gardens, FL *“The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead." Robert K. Greenleaf* On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:38 AM John Robert Stratton <N5AUS@n5aus.com> wrote:
All
I believe Kermit's "remote meeting held electronically" has more gravitas than "video conference". We did not have a conference; we held a meeting.
I support Kermit's descriptor.
_______________________________________
John Robert Stratton
N5AUS
Director
West Gulf Division
Office: 512-445-6262
Cell: 512-426-2028
P.O. Box 2232
Austin, Texas 78768-2232
*_______________________________________* On 7/20/20 7:16 AM, Kermit Carlson via arrl-odv wrote:
Hello Jeff et al,
May I suggest that the term a “remote meeting held electronically” might be a better expression than “video conference”...
We do need to make a statement including the plans to reconvene in about one one month.
73, Kermit W9XA
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS>
On Sunday, July 19, 2020, 15:45, Jeff Ryan <k0rm@comcast.net> <k0rm@comcast.net> wrote:
Rick:
I concur; I believe that an article about holding a video conference, motions approved to date and the fact that we recessed would be in order.
73,
Jeff, K0RM ------------------------------ *From:* k5ur--- via exec-com *Sent:* Sun Jul 19 14:34:32 MDT 2020 *To:* "david@davidsiddall-law.com" <david@davidsiddall-law.com> , "exec-com@arrl.org" <exec-com@arrl.org> *Subject:* [exec-com:9597] Re: Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
Dave and all:
Thanks for the nice comments about the meeting.
It would be good for us to say something about the meeting even though we are recessed and minutes will not be approved until we conclude. Also, it would be good for Dave to be able to inform the FCC about the band plan as that was information the FCC wanted. We really need the FCC to get moving on our proceedings.
I've asked Barry to check with Spinella, but I wonder if we could have Rick Lindquist craft a very brief article of the actions thus far. We will be getting questions from members so we need to be prepared to say something besides "we can't talk about it."
Comments?
Rick
-----Original Message----- From: david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> <david@davidsiddall-law.com> To: exec-com@arrl.org <exec-com@arrl.org> <exec-com@arrl.org> Sent: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 1:26 pm Subject: [exec-com:9596] Congratulations on the Successful Virtual Board Meeting
EC,
Congratulations to Rick and Directors for a very well run meeting yesterday.
With adoption of the band plan report, I am beginning to prepare the requisite FCC Petition for Rulemaking.
A couple of questions related to this.
- Do directors publicly discuss Board actions before release of the minutes, or generally are actions pretty held close to the vest until the minutes announce actions? - And second, will minutes of this portion of the meeting be released within the next several weeks , or will they be released only after the meeting is adjourned (maybe next month)?
Thanks.
Dave K3ZJ
*David R. Siddall* *Managing Partner* *DS Law, PLLC* *1629 K St. NW, Ste 300* *Washington, DC 20006* *direct: +1 202 559 4690*
[image: Default Line] *Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited.* This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com ------------------------------
exec-com mailing list exec-com@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/exec-com _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing listarrl-odv@reflector.arrl.orghttps://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (6)
-
Bud Hippisley -
David Norris -
Jeff Ryan -
John Robert Stratton -
Kermit Carlson -
Mickey Baker