[arrl-odv:29497] No CEO Job Posting on ARRL Web-Site?
More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract. There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why? The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere. Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position. All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying. Is the CEO Search Committee active? Additional comment from members - The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult. As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions. At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion. Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search. I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter. 73, Dick Norton, N6AA
+1 Please, let’s not drag this on. Members are already complaining that they are hearing nothing. We have lots of stuff to get done, so let’s get a move on. 73 Ria, N2RJ On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Richard Norton via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract.
There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why?
The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere.
Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position.
All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying.
Is the CEO Search Committee active?
Additional comment from members -
The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult.
As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions.
At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion.
Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search.
I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter.
73,
Dick Norton, N6AA
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Hello Ria and Dick The CEO Search Committee did meet for the first timeon Thursday evening. We did have good progress and we dohave a draft job description that is circulating within the Committee.Once the draft has approval with the Committee we willcirculate the result with the Board. Our next scheduled meetingis February 6 and it is my intent to have the job descriptionon ODV well ahead of that meeting. Before the description is circulated we definitely need to agree as a Committee on the specifics of the mechanics of howthose applications are accepted and how they are distributed foraccess to the Directors, Vice-Directors and Officers. The decisionof those details is on the agenda for this Thursday's meeting.The Committee meeting report will be circulated within the Committeethis weekend and will be sent to ODV once it has been approved. 73, Kermit W9XA On Saturday, February 1, 2020, 11:47:09 AM CST, rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote: +1 Please, let’s not drag this on. Members are already complaining that they are hearing nothing. We have lots of stuff to get done, so let’s get a move on. 73Ria, N2RJ On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Richard Norton via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract. There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why? The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere. Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position. All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying. Is the CEO Search Committee active? Additional comment from members - The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult. As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions. At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion. Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search. I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter. 73, Dick Norton, N6AA _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
I'm glad Dick brought up the question, as I was going to ask for an update report tomorrow. The CEO Selection Committee is committed to providing an update every two weeks to the rest of us per the original Board motion, and we hadn't heard anything yet. Also, a question in the interest of transparency for the rest of the Board not on the Selection Committee: Who ended up being the "player to be named later" from the A&F Committee put on the CEO Selection Committee? Just the fact that we had to vote on the motion with that mystery there itself is somewhat disturbing. 73; Mike W7VO
On February 1, 2020 at 10:49 AM Kermit Carlson via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
Hello Ria and Dick
The CEO Search Committee did meet for the first time on Thursday evening. We did have good progress and we do have a draft job description that is circulating within the Committee. Once the draft has approval with the Committee we will circulate the result with the Board. Our next scheduled meeting is February 6 and it is my intent to have the job description on ODV well ahead of that meeting.
Before the description is circulated we definitely need to agree as a Committee on the specifics of the mechanics of how those applications are accepted and how they are distributed for access to the Directors, Vice-Directors and Officers. The decision of those details is on the agenda for this Thursday's meeting. The Committee meeting report will be circulated within the Committee this weekend and will be sent to ODV once it has been approved.
73, Kermit W9XA
On Saturday, February 1, 2020, 11:47:09 AM CST, rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Please, let’s not drag this on.
Members are already complaining that they are hearing nothing.
We have lots of stuff to get done, so let’s get a move on.
73 Ria, N2RJ
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Richard Norton via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org > wrote:
> > More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract.
There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why?
The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere.
Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position.
All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying.
Is the CEO Search Committee active?
Additional comment from members -
The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult.
As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions.
At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion.
Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search.
I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter.
73,
Dick Norton, N6AA
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
> _______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
"player to be named later" from the A&F Committee Mike, that is Jeff Ryan. 73Rick - K5UR -----Original Message----- From: Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net> To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Sat, Feb 1, 2020 1:54 pm Subject: [arrl-odv:29500] Re: No CEO Job Posting on ARRL Web-Site? I'm glad Dick brought up the question, as I was going to ask for an update report tomorrow. The CEO Selection Committee is committed to providing an update every two weeks to the rest of us per the original Board motion, and we hadn't heard anything yet. Also, a question in the interest of transparency for the rest of the Board not on the Selection Committee: Who ended up being the "player to be named later" from the A&F Committee put on the CEO Selection Committee? Just the fact that we had to vote on the motion with that mystery there itself is somewhat disturbing. 73; Mike W7VO On February 1, 2020 at 10:49 AM Kermit Carlson via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: Hello Ria and Dick The CEO Search Committee did meet for the first time on Thursday evening. We did have good progress and we do have a draft job description that is circulating within the Committee. Once the draft has approval with the Committee we will circulate the result with the Board. Our next scheduled meeting is February 6 and it is my intent to have the job description on ODV well ahead of that meeting. Before the description is circulated we definitely need to agree as a Committee on the specifics of the mechanics of how those applications are accepted and how they are distributed for access to the Directors, Vice-Directors and Officers. The decision of those details is on the agenda for this Thursday's meeting. The Committee meeting report will be circulated within the Committee this weekend and will be sent to ODV once it has been approved. 73, Kermit W9XA On Saturday, February 1, 2020, 11:47:09 AM CST, rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote: +1 Please, let’s not drag this on. Members are already complaining that they are hearing nothing. We have lots of stuff to get done, so let’s get a move on. 73 Ria, N2RJ On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Richard Norton via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract. There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why? The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere. Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position. All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying. Is the CEO Search Committee active? Additional comment from members - The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult. As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions. At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion. Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search. I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter. 73, Dick Norton, N6AA _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
So, any updates? On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Richard Norton via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract.
There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why?
The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere.
Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position.
All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying.
Is the CEO Search Committee active?
Additional comment from members -
The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult.
As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions.
At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion.
Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search.
I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter.
73,
Dick Norton, N6AA
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Hello Ria We have just finished our second meeting of the CEO SearchCommittee. The CEO job posting draft will be sent for review by Connecticut Counsel and then sent to ODV for review. The minutesfrom the first meeting last Thursday will be posted to ODV shortly. 73, Kermit W9XA On Thursday, February 6, 2020, 7:27:50 PM CST, rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote: So, any updates? On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Richard Norton via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: More than two weeks have passed since the Board did not renew the previous ARRL CEO's contract. There appears to be no notice of solicitation for the job shown on the ARRL web-site. Why? The Board's action was well publicized, resulting in a storm of comment on the ham radio blogosphere. Every suitable candidate for the position should have heard about the upcoming vacancy. Every suitable candidate should have decided that he or she is interested in the position by now, with resume material either prepared or under preparation. A requirement for the position should be knowledge of and interest in Amateur Radio and the ARRL. We do not need someone who has a ham license and who has a record of achievement in an unrelated field to get talked into taking this position. We need someone who understands Amateur Radio, the League, and the requirements of the position, and who wants that position. All Board members had a printed copy of the previous CEO job description given to them at the Board meeting. It should have been a simple and rapid task to polish this and post it to the ARRL site. (I would remove the last two subsections, "Required and Preferred Education and Experience" and simply use the points as criteria to evaluate each candidate.) I doubt if the exact wording of the solicitation will either encourage, discourage, or impact a candidate from applying. Is the CEO Search Committee active? Additional comment from members - The Southwestern Division ARRL Forums are two-way interchanges between the Director and the membership. At the recent Quartzfest Specialty Convention, approximately 150 participants brought their own chairs to an outdoor venue and participated. A member video-recorded the event and posted it on the web so that any of you can verify what I report here. Also, the ARRL Atlantic Division Director and the new International Vice President were there for you to consult. As the CEO non-renewal had been a hot topic on the blogosphere, I dedicated some time to attempting to quell some of the wild speculation about the Board's actions. At the conclusion, I discussed the options of 1) performing a new search for a replacement and 2) immediately selecting from the candidates vetted eighteen months ago. Approximately 30 people voted for a new search, 40 voted for immediate use of the last search, and 80 did not care or did not wish to express an opinion. Posting the job description on the ARRL site with something like a thirty-day deadline for applications would certainly satisfy the minority who desire a new search. I hope the committee will expeditiously move forward on this matter. 73, Dick Norton, N6AA _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (5)
-
k5ur＠aol.com -
Kermit Carlson -
Michael Ritz -
Richard Norton -
rjairam＠gmail.com