It was Wade's comment, not Dave's, but Paul has already covered it. Wade's Cedar Rapids test report is still the standard by which others are judged. But this is principally so we can show, if necessary, that the measurements of the City of Manassas are flawed. We want to focus on documenting interference rather than making measurements. Dave K1ZZ ________________________________ From: JIM WEAVER, K8JE [mailto:k8je@arrl.org] Sent: Thu 3/9/2006 4:39 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:13864] FCC Action - BPL Interference Complaint-Manassas, VA Dave, your comment about a PE signing any report from Manassas is right on target in my opinion. If they don't have one, you might consider hiring one to review the report with the intent of pointing out pitfalls in relying on potentially-flawed (indefensible) date. If nothing else, this might force Manassas to go back to the drawing board to develop data under fully-qualified direction. This tactic has worked in the business world previously. Jim Weaver, K8JE Director, Great Lakes Division ARRL; http://www.arrl.org/ 5065 Bethany Rd., Mason, OH 45040 Tel.: 513-459-0142; E-mail: k8je@arrl.org ARRL: The reason Amateur Radio Is! MEMBERS: The reason ARRL Is! -----Original Message----- From: Wade [mailto:walstrom@mchsi.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:46 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:13864] FCC Action - BPL Interference Complaint-Manassas, VA I wonder if they could direct COMTek to do that for them, in which case we need to examine the results very carefully. This movement from the FCC is encouraging but we can still get blown off by all these guys with fuzzy data. I would sure want to see a "PE" after somebody's name on that report. 73, Wade W0EJ -----Original Message----- From: Joel Harrison [mailto:w5zn@arrl.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 12:08 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:13864] FCC Action - BPL Interference Complaint-Manassas, VA Exactly! My opinion is that in order for them to supply the info requested by FCC they will have to invest extra time of their own contract it out, which in turn will increase their costs. If they have to expend this effort in each and every case, maybe they will sit back and reassess whether it is cost effective for them to continue with the current configuration. Joel -----Original Message----- From: Wade [mailto:walstrom@mchsi.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:47 AM To: 'Joel Harrison'; 'arrl-odv' Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:13864] FCC Action - BPL Interference Complaint-Manassas, VA It will be interesting to see what the City of Manassas comes up with for measurements as I doubt the City has the technical competence available to do this on their own. 73, Wade W0EJ