[arrl-odv:31349] Re: 5.9 GHz band FCC vote

That is correct. As discussed, no change to amateur secondary allocation on this band. From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> on behalf of "Hippisley, George (Bud), W2RU, (Dir, RK)" <w2ru@arrl.org> Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 at 11:35 AM To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> Subject: [arrl-odv:31348] 5.9 GHz band FCC vote I just received a Tweet that the FCC has “voted to [designate] the lower 45 MHz [of the 5.9-GHZ band] for unlicensed uses and the upper 30 MHz for enhanced automotive safety using C-V2X”. Bud, W2RU

Hello Dave, Bud et al - I was on the FCC site just now looking at a different issue and found the announcement. Upon loading the email from arrl-odv I see that Bud's reportof the tweet has beat me to it... and as Dave Siddall reported there is nochange to the amateur secondary allocation on 5.7 Ghz. The full release can be viewed here -https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-368228A1.pdf 73, Kermit W9XA On Wednesday, November 18, 2020, 10:38:41 AM CST, david davidsiddall-law. com <david@davidsiddall-law.com> wrote: That is correct. As discussed, no change to amateur secondary allocation on this band. From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> on behalf of "Hippisley, George (Bud), W2RU, (Dir, RK)" <w2ru@arrl.org> Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 at 11:35 AM To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> Subject: [arrl-odv:31348] 5.9 GHz band FCC vote I just received a Tweet that the FCC has “voted to [designate] the lower 45 MHz [of the 5.9-GHZ band] for unlicensed uses and the upper 30 MHz for enhanced automotive safety using C-V2X”. Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (2)
-
david davidsiddall-law.com
-
Kermit Carlson