[ARRL-ODV:9658] Re: Confidential re ARRL v. FCC, United States Court of ...

28 Oct
2003
28 Oct
'03
6:44 p.m.
In a message dated 10/28/2003 1:34:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, dick@pobox.com writes:
Before I get to my comments on this petition, I believe there is an editorial typo in Chris Imlay's briefing text in [ARRL-ODV:9650]. The first sentence of the fourth paragraph states that "ARRL has exceeded its statutory authority...". I believe the term "ARRL" is really meant to be "FCC".
Board 3, Imlay 0. I feel like the Boston Red Sox. Chris
7807
Age (days ago)
7807
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
W3KD@aol.com