Right, Rick. I'm sure that if they drove out to your station with little bitty bicon and loop antennas, they wouldn't hear what you hear in your shack. I've drafted a letter to Franca and am trying to get it coordinated today. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Roderick, Rick (aol.com) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:36 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [ARRL-ODV:10943] Re: Re: FW: Complaint Progress Energy Part 15 Devices Oh, gee whiz.... That letter is awful. OK.... notch this, notch that, so you hams have a little interference.... Sorry hams, it ain't that bad. You can see the hand writing on the wall. 73, K5UR In a message dated 7/22/2004 8:31:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Sumner, Dave,  K1ZZ" <dsumner@arrl.org> writes:

The FCC has sent the attached letter describing its findings in the North Carolina interference case.

Obviously we will not let it go unchallenged.

Dave K1ZZ

-----Original Message----- From: Alan Stillwell [mailto:Alan.Stillwell@fcc.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:20 AM To: n4tab@earthlink.net Cc: Len.S.Anthony@pgnmail.com; matt.oja@pgnmail.com; bill.godwin@pgnmail.com; Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ; Imlay, Chris; George Dillon; Riley Hollingsworth Subject: Complaint re: Progress Energy Part 15 Devices

Dear Mr. Brown,

The attached letter responds to your complaint of April 27, 2004 regarding the operations of Progress Energy Corporation's BPL trials in Southern Wake County, North Carolina.  A signed copy of this letter is being mailed to your address as provided in your complaint.

Alan Stillwell Senior Associate Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission