[ARRL-ODV:7343] Re: Antenna Rights

15 Jun
2002
15 Jun
'02
2:36 a.m.
Chris, your'e correct of course. I just got duped on that one! 73, Art "Puns are the enemy of wit" Louis XIV ----- Original Message ----- From: W3KD@aol.com <mailto:W3KD@aol.com> To: arrl-odv <mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:46 PM Subject: [ARRL-ODV:7340] Re: Antenna Rights In a message dated 6/14/2002 2:45:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, w6xd@attbi.com <mailto:w6xd@attbi.com> writes: If a ham has a city-issued permit for an Amateur Radio antenna and then wants to duplex a commercial transmitter on to that same permitted antenna, the city should have no basis to object - right? It's Diplex, Art. I get caught on that too. Chris
8308
Age (days ago)
8308
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Art Goddard