[ARRL-ODV:11479] Re: Executive Committee recommendations bandwidth petition

Joel, For a Circuit Rider in Arkansas you are really on the ball! I was checking, as indicated, that my expectations were correct. They are. Tnx for the confirmation. 73 Jim Weaver, K8JE Director, Great Lakes Division ARRL; http://www.arrl.org/ 5065 Bethany Rd., Mason, OH 45040 Tel.: 513-459-0142; E-mail: k8je@arrl.org ARRL: The reason Amateur Radio Is! MEMBERS: The reason ARRL Is! -----Original Message----- From: Joel Harrison [mailto:w5zn@arrl.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:24 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: [ARRL-ODV:11478] Re: Executive Committee recommendations bandwidth petition Jim, The EC will be making an informal presentation to the Board on Thursday evening to review and go over the rationale behind the proposal, answer questions and discuss options, so that during the board meeting we can take some final action, similar to what we did with our restructuring petition. So, from my understanding of our discussion this past weekend, the answer to both of your questions is YES. If another one of the EC members has a different understanding, I'm sure they'll speak up! I don't, however, expect that there will be anything other than maybe a little further "fine tweaking" of the current proposal, but that is just my opinion. 73 Joel W5ZN -----Original Message----- From: Jim K8JE [mailto:K8JE@arrl.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 7:08 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: [ARRL-ODV:11475] Re: Executive Committee recommendations bandwidth petition All, I have two questions and a suggestion regarding the present fine tuning of the regulating by bandwidth proposal. QUESTIONS 1. Do I understand correctly that it is not yet being hammered into a formal petition? The title of the message might suggest it is. 2. Do I understand correctly that we will have an opportunity to review and, if deemed appropriate, make further changes in the proposal at the January meeting? SUGGESTION 1. I think it would be a good idea openly to thank (in no uncertain terms) the members who shared comments with us for the time, effort and dedication they clearly showed in sharing these comments with us. I see absolutely no downside to going just a bit out of the way to humanize this effort and tell the membership we like it when they and us collaborate to achieve a common goal on behalf of Amateur Radio. Tnx, 73, Jim Jim Weaver, K8JE
participants (1)
-
Jim K8JE