[arrl-odv:21294] Splitting the Arizona Section into Three Sections
*Background* The ARRL is about to lose the most active and productive Section Manager in the Southwestern Division. Arizona SM, Tom Fagan, K7DF, appears to not be running for another term. He reports spending between $7000 and $10000 of his own money on ARRL business each year, above what he is reimbursed by the League. His family has therefore encouraged him not to run again. I'm not sure of the accuracy of his estimate, but agree that he very likely overspends his ARRL budget. I don't believe he has been successful in getting significant additional funding from Dave Patton. I've attempted to get Tom Fagan to submit expense reports for some big hamfests to me, where he would be eligible for reimbursement as an Assistant Director, representing the League at an important event where the cost of either the Director or Vice-director attending would be unreasonably high. I have gone to about one or two Arizona events per year. Since it involves over 400 miles of travel each way, I have felt the cost to the League would not be warranted for me to attend more. Tom Fagan has done an excellent job of representing the the ARRL at these events. For some reason, he has not done so to date. In 2012, he represented ARRL at 14 hamfests. Arizona apparently has 18 scheduled next year, in 2013. They are spread out all over the state. *ARRL Section Manager Budgets* The ARRL uses a formula for determining Section Manager budgets that includes only the area of the section and the number of League members. There is no consideration for how the members are distributed in the area or where the Section Manager lives with respect to the section activities. The formula works adequately for many sections. In fact, it is probably adequate for the other 4 sections in the Southwestern Division. It is not adequate for Arizona, due to the size and the fact that the population is spread out in a number of areas over the state. *Arizona* * * Arizona is a big state, and the population is spread out. It has more than the total area of the W1 and W2 districts combined, where there are 13 ARRL sections. Phoenix is the 6th largest city in the USA, and growing. It will likely move up that list. Tucson is the 33rd largest, and is 110 miles from Phoenix. The current Arizona SM, K7DF, lives in Tucson. Currently, one person has filed nomination papers for Arizona SM, and he lives in Yuma. Yuma is in the far southwest corner of the state, approximately 200 miles from Phoenix, 240 miles from Tucson, 275 to 300 miles from the northern cities. Arizona presently has the largest ARRL membership of any section in the Southwestern Division, and it continues to grow as hams move into the state. 3768 total Arizona ARRL members show in the latest report. In the winter, there are a significant number of "snowbirds" who spend the season in Arizona. From the attendee mix at the Yuma Hamfest, I'll estimate 500 more are present in winter. *Arizona Hamfests* 14 hamfests scheduled in 2013 include the following. Phoenix area - 5 Tucson area - 4 Northern cities - 4 Yuma - 1 Quartzsite - 1 Trip costs are estimated using 55.5 cents per mile, $80 hotel for trips over 100 miles one-way, and $25 meals. To cover these hamfests alone, from Tucson would cost $4044, and from Yuma would cost $5631. The Arizona SM budget is approximately $3500. The travel costs of the hamfests alone are greater than the total budget. The Arizona hams have grown accustomed to League representation at their hamfests. In addition to the hamfests, the SM often attends the Southwestern Division Convention, and presents talks at a number of radio club meetings. The cost for either myself of the vice director to attend one of these events is in the $700 - $900 range, due to the long travel involved. It is to the League's advantage to have these events covered by Arizona residents. *Possible Splitting of the Arizona Section* We have talked about dividing Arizona into three sections, Southern Arizona, Phoenix, and Northern Arizona. This would make SM coverage more manageable. The exact dividing lines might not exactly follow county lines. K7DF will be discussing this at upcoming Amateur Radio Council of Arizona (ARCA) meetings. This is expected to be something quite welcome in the state as it has been brought up previously. More information on ARCA can be found at http://www.arca-az.org/ I am unable to find anything in the Director's Handbook about what it takes to create new sections. Northern New York was created somewhat recently, with a League population of only 319 members. Also, note that the present NNY SM is located only 144 miles from Albany, a reasonably large city in ENY. *Question* What is the procedure for creating new sections? Does it simply involve a director's motion to do it? If so, I'd like to make such a motion at the January meeting. Creation of three sections will allow the League to better serve the Arizona membership. I hope you will support such action. 73, Dick Norton, N6AA
Dick, I can sympathize with you and your AZ. SM; however, I, too, do not see it as being unique. Kentucky, for example, could also be divided easily into two or three sections because of it's considerable width. Covering Louisa on the far eastern end and Paducah on the far western require much travel. With population centers in the western and eastern ends, the central part of the commonwealth and immediately south of Cincinnati, the KY SM often is pulled in at least three different ways nearly simultaneously. Similar situations occur in MI as well as OH. However, I do not think it feasible to divide either of the four states into additional Sections. I suspect that all that doing this would accomplish is to increase the operating cost of running the SM field program and further complicating it's management (at still higher cost). I believe off hand that closer cooperation between the SM and the ASMs, as well as with the Directors, could provide a better answer. FWIW Jim Jim Weaver K8JE Sent from my I-Phone On Dec 1, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Richard J Norton <richardjnorton@dslextreme.com> wrote:
Background
The ARRL is about to lose the most active and productive Section Manager in the Southwestern Division. Arizona SM, Tom Fagan, K7DF, appears to not be running for another term.
He reports spending between $7000 and $10000 of his own money on ARRL business each year, above what he is reimbursed by the League. His family has therefore encouraged him not to run again. I'm not sure of the accuracy of his estimate, but agree that he very likely overspends his ARRL budget.
I don't believe he has been successful in getting significant additional funding from Dave Patton. I've attempted to get Tom Fagan to submit expense reports for some big hamfests to me, where he would be eligible for reimbursement as an Assistant Director, representing the League at an important event where the cost of either the Director or Vice-director attending would be unreasonably high. I have gone to about one or two Arizona events per year. Since it involves over 400 miles of travel each way, I have felt the cost to the League would not be warranted for me to attend more. Tom Fagan has done an excellent job of representing the the ARRL at these events. For some reason, he has not done so to date.
In 2012, he represented ARRL at 14 hamfests. Arizona apparently has 18 scheduled next year, in 2013. They are spread out all over the state.
ARRL Section Manager Budgets
The ARRL uses a formula for determining Section Manager budgets that includes only the area of the section and the number of League members. There is no consideration for how the members are distributed in the area or where the Section Manager lives with respect to the section activities.
The formula works adequately for many sections. In fact, it is probably adequate for the other 4 sections in the Southwestern Division. It is not adequate for Arizona, due to the size and the fact that the population is spread out in a number of areas over the state.
Arizona
Arizona is a big state, and the population is spread out. It has more than the total area of the W1 and W2 districts combined, where there are 13 ARRL sections.
Phoenix is the 6th largest city in the USA, and growing. It will likely move up that list. Tucson is the 33rd largest, and is 110 miles from Phoenix.
The current Arizona SM, K7DF, lives in Tucson.
Currently, one person has filed nomination papers for Arizona SM, and he lives in Yuma. Yuma is in the far southwest corner of the state, approximately 200 miles from Phoenix, 240 miles from Tucson, 275 to 300 miles from the northern cities.
Arizona presently has the largest ARRL membership of any section in the Southwestern Division, and it continues to grow as hams move into the state. 3768 total Arizona ARRL members show in the latest report. In the winter, there are a significant number of "snowbirds" who spend the season in Arizona. From the attendee mix at the Yuma Hamfest, I'll estimate 500 more are present in winter.
Arizona Hamfests
14 hamfests scheduled in 2013 include the following.
Phoenix area - 5 Tucson area - 4 Northern cities - 4 Yuma - 1 Quartzsite - 1
Trip costs are estimated using 55.5 cents per mile, $80 hotel for trips over 100 miles one-way, and $25 meals. To cover these hamfests alone, from Tucson would cost $4044, and from Yuma would cost $5631.
The Arizona SM budget is approximately $3500. The travel costs of the hamfests alone are greater than the total budget. The Arizona hams have grown accustomed to League representation at their hamfests. In addition to the hamfests, the SM often attends the Southwestern Division Convention, and presents talks at a number of radio club meetings.
The cost for either myself of the vice director to attend one of these events is in the $700 - $900 range, due to the long travel involved. It is to the League's advantage to have these events covered by Arizona residents.
Possible Splitting of the Arizona Section
We have talked about dividing Arizona into three sections, Southern Arizona, Phoenix, and Northern Arizona. This would make SM coverage more manageable. The exact dividing lines might not exactly follow county lines.
K7DF will be discussing this at upcoming Amateur Radio Council of Arizona (ARCA) meetings. This is expected to be something quite welcome in the state as it has been brought up previously. More information on ARCA can be found at http://www.arca-az.org/
I am unable to find anything in the Director's Handbook about what it takes to create new sections. Northern New York was created somewhat recently, with a League population of only 319 members. Also, note that the present NNY SM is located only 144 miles from Albany, a reasonably large city in ENY.
Question
What is the procedure for creating new sections? Does it simply involve a director's motion to do it? If so, I'd like to make such a motion at the January meeting.
Creation of three sections will allow the League to better serve the Arizona membership. I hope you will support such action.
73,
Dick Norton, N6AA
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Dick, the established procedure for considering changes to section boundaries is attached. Currently there are eight states that are subdivided into two or more sections: California, Texas, Florida, New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. With the exception of Washington, these states were all subdivided many years ago although there have been further subdivisions more recently in the cases of Texas, Florida, and New York. The only subdivided states with fewer than 5,000 full members are Massachusetts and New Jersey. NNJ, SNJ, EMA and WMA date back to the early 1920s. If we were drawing section boundaries today we probably would not subdivide Massachusetts, but as you know NNJ and SNJ are in separate orbits around NYC and Philadelphia, respectively, which results in their being in different divisions as well. I think it is fair to say that in most of the states that are subdivided, there are issues that do not exist to the same extent in the states in which the state and section are the same. Our subdivisions seldom correspond to those used for emergency management by states and served agencies, and never follow the boundaries of Congressional districts. State government liaison can be problematic when there is more than one SM appointing an SGL in one state; it works when the SMs and SGLs cooperate, otherwise not. There are four states with larger numbers of full members than Arizona: Ohio, Illinois, Virginia, and Michigan. The largest by far in terms of members is Ohio, and while Ohio is a bit more compact than Arizona it has no unpopulated or underpopulated areas. The other three states all have distance issues from one end or one side to the other that are at least as significant as Arizona's. If Arizona were to be subdivided, it would be reasonable to expect similar moves in these and other states. Comparing the situation in Arizona with that in other states and sections, it seems to me that the problem is one of unrealistic expectations. It is unrealistic to expect the SM to personally represent the ARRL at that many events. Some delegation is necessary. In addition you have offered Tom alternative funding for some travel that is within your prerogative for employing Assistant Directors, and for whatever reason he has chosen not to take it. In short, while it is easy to empathize with a volunteer as conscientious as Tom, in my view subdividing a state like Arizona would have a number of unintended and undesirable consequences. 73, Dave Sumner, K1ZZ
participants (3)
-
James E. Weaver -
Richard J Norton -
Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ