[ARRL-ODV:9655] Re: Confidential re ARRL v. FCC, United States Court of ...
28 Oct
2003
28 Oct
'03
6:42 p.m.
One other typo in my memo (a Freudian slip). I should have said that FCC, not ARRL, exceeded its statutory authority. I wish ARRL had some statutory authority to exceed... Thanks to Sandy for that catch. 73, Chris
7807
Age (days ago)
7807
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
W3KD＠aol.com