13 OCT, 2004 - 1705 CDT Hello Dave Patton... First of all, thanks for doing the initial screening and sorting of all the bandwidth petition comments. As a general rule, I have been trying to answer the thoughtful, detailed comments - even the purely negative ones. But I do not have the time or the inclination to respond to someone who says "drop it" with no supporting arguments. I read that kind of input as being equivalent to "Don't confuse me with the facts as my mind is already made up." Besides, I don't want to get into a dialog with a man with the last name of Genovese. I don't want any offers I can't refuse. <grin> 73 - Dick, W9GIG ====================================================================== Subject: FW: pactor robots Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:08:47 -0400 From: "Patton, David NN1N" <nn1n@arrl.org> To: "Isely, Dick (Dir, Central)" <grisely@speakeasy.net> Not acked, just checking to see if you want to follow up with this? -----Original Message----- From: Joseph.A.Genovese@abbott.com [mailto:Joseph.A.Genovese@abbott.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:53 PM To: bandwidth Subject: pactor robots I'm totally against it. Why don't you guys work other issues, i.e ant. regs. BPL etc. Joe WA9KOD