[ARRL-ODV:11709] Re: Briarcliff Manor BPL interference case

7 Jan
2005
7 Jan
'05
10:13 p.m.
In a message dated 1/7/2005 4:42:54 PM Eastern Standard Time, jbellows@skypoint.com writes:
Has Ambient or FCC ever indicated why the use of two different timelines in the resolution of BPL interference issues should apply? Specifically why a system shutdown for even a few days pending resolution for the relatively few number of actual BPL customers is unreasonable, but a disruption to and the loss of use of a licensed service for over 10 months is permissible?
Nicely put, Jay. Mind if I appropriate it for our recon petition, now under active drafting? Chris
7371
Age (days ago)
7371
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
W3KD@aol.com