[arrl-odv:27225] 1951 license manual
When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it... Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-) Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file... -- Tom ===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
Wow! TU Tom. With the exception of a couple of technical and regulatory updates it changed very little from 1951 to 1975! ARRL came out with Tune in the World in 1976 and it was far more detailed and easier for a kid to learn plus it came with the cool Morse instructional cassette. It was a tad easier to deal with than the Ameco LP or Dad’s old Signal Corps McIlroy paper tape machine. 73 David A. Norris, K5UZ Director, Delta Division Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2018, at 8:53 AM, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote:
When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it...
Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-)
Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file...
-- Tom
===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 <ARRL LM 1951 27th Edition Novice1.pdf> _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
It's clear that this document reflects a much different attitude about licensing, both from FCC and the amateur community. The licensee was *expected* to go find out things, and this worked because it was also the licensee's expectation of him- or herself. I suspect that this genie is out of the bottle--forever. 73, Greg, K0GW On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote:
When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it...
Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-)
Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file...
-- Tom
===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Having been witness to a lot of dialog recently on the subject, I have observed that there is in the broadcast engineering community a lack of agreement about the purpose of FCC examinations for Amateur Radio licenses. To that aging demographic, there is an attitude heard often that there is no value any longer to an Amateur license because the questions are too simple, an in-depth understanding of the technology is not required, schematic drawings are no longer required of an examinee, etc. and therefore holding an Amateur license is not an indication of any scholarly understanding of the medium at all. On the other side are those who, I think correctly, argue that the purpose of Amateur licensing, perhaps especially entry level licensing, is to enable matriculation, not graduation. It is not a measure of achievement in technical self-training, but is the "ante up" that allows the self-training to *start*. It seems to me that the supporters of our Tech Enhancement proposal apply this metric, and the opponents hold the other one. 73, Chris W3KD On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:39 AM, G Widin <gpwidin@comcast.net> wrote:
It's clear that this document reflects a much different attitude about licensing, both from FCC and the amateur community. The licensee was *expected* to go find out things, and this worked because it was also the licensee's expectation of him- or herself. I suspect that this genie is out of the bottle--forever. 73, Greg, K0GW
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote:
When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it...
Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-)
Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file...
-- Tom
===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
-- Christopher D. Imlay Booth, Freret & Imlay, LLC 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011 (301) 384-5525 telephone (301) 384-6384 facsimile W3KD@ARRL.ORG
It was a simpler time ... ;-) Mike Raisbeck k1twf@arrl.net -----Original Message----- From: G Widin <gpwidin@comcast.net> To: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> Cc: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@arrl.org> Sent: Tue, May 8, 2018 11:39 am Subject: [arrl-odv:27227] Re: 1951 license manual It's clear that this document reflects a much different attitude about licensing, both from FCC and the amateur community. The licensee was expected to go find out things, and this worked because it was also the licensee's expectation of him- or herself. I suspect that this genie is out of the bottle--forever. 73, Greg, K0GW On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote: When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it... Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-) Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file... -- Tom ===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Hello Tom - A current reprint of that issue of that license manual would make for a very interesting read - and it would help demonstrate that the older tests were not difficult for the entry class license. I remember spending hours reading the license manual - while preparing for my trek to school ; a journey that was uphill both there AND back. 73, Kermit W9XA On Tuesday, May 8, 2018, 9:09:18 AM CDT, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote: When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it... Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-) Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file... -- Tom ===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Wow, deja vu all over again. That's the publication I used when studying for my trip to the SFO FCC office at 323A, Customshouse, San Francisco. That was ca March 1952. It took until July 12 for the license to show up in my mail box! Thanks for the memories, Tom! On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote:
When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it...
Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-)
Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file...
-- Tom
===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
Bob reminded me of how long that wait was for the Novice ticket back in 75/76. It was about 10 weeks for me. The Jr. High was just across the street and I ran home everyday at lunch to get the mail. Finally it arrived! QRV! 73 David A. Norris, K5UZ Director, Delta Division Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2018, at 7:48 PM, Bob Vallio <rbvallio@gmail.com> wrote:
Wow, deja vu all over again. That's the publication I used when studying for my trip to the SFO FCC office at 323A, Customshouse, San Francisco. That was ca March 1952. It took until July 12 for the license to show up in my mail box! Thanks for the memories, Tom!
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com> wrote:
When you get questions from people about the current Technician "entry" level license, you might want to use the attached (partial) copy of the 1951 ARRL License Manual. It had information for both the (new) Novice license and the Technician. The portion attached is the front cover and the three pages devoted to the Novice. That was it...
Compare the 1951 Novice to the present 2 pound, 400+ question, 350+ page publication we have today for the Technician. :-)
Hope this comes through OK, the scanned pages make a pretty large file...
-- Tom
===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
participants (7)
-
Bob Vallio -
Christopher Imlay -
David Norris -
G Widin -
Kermit Carlson -
o -
Tom Frenaye