[ARRL-ODV:11574] revised bandwidth proposal text?Dave, I think it would be desirable as members would like to know we are moving forward. An interim update will allow members to understand current status and provide additional input. Plus, the Board (other than EC) won't be seen as uninformed. Jim K9JF ----- Original Message ----- From: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ To: arrl-odv Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 6:54 PM Subject: [ARRL-ODV:11575] Re: revised bandwidth proposal text? Not yet, Tom. I thought it would be better to wait until after the January Board meeting, since there are likely to be further revisions and bringing the EC recommended revisions on board might signal more finality than is appropriate. But I'll be glad to do it if you think it's desirable. Dave K1ZZ -----Original Message----- From: Frenaye, Tom (Dir, NE) Sent: Sun 11/14/2004 12:32 AM To: arrl-odv Cc: Subject: [ARRL-ODV:11574] revised bandwidth proposal text? Is there a revision to the public version of the Bandwidth petition available to the public that incorporates the revisions recommended by the Executive Committee? I've had a couple of requests from people looking for one. -- Tom ===== e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444