[arrl-odv:18850] Re:RE: Fwd: [CQ-Contest] Broken ARRL clean sweep mug

Bob, of course the broken mugs (so far we know of 9) will be replaced at no additional cost to the persons who earned them and paid for them. I hope no one doubted that for an instant. Dave ________________________________ From: Bob Vallio [mailto:rbvallio@gmail.com] Sent: Mon 4/12/2010 8:34 PM To: arrl-odv Cc: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:18846] Re: Fwd: [CQ-Contest] Broken ARRL clean sweep mug One thing I have yet to see is someone on HQ Staff taking ownership of this issue. It's too late to fix the broken mugs, but I would hope that a policy has been, or soon will be, put in place to replace the broken mugs at no charge; and, that some mailing room standards will be adopted to preclude a recurrence of this operational error. Who will it be? Bob Vallio -- W6RGG On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Dwayne Allen <dwayne@wy7fd.com> wrote: We (WY7SS) got ten (five for each contest mode) and NONE were broken. WY7FD -----Original Message----- From: jfenster@pacifier.com [mailto:jfenster@pacifier.com] Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 20:29 To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:18843] Re: Fwd: [CQ-Contest] Broken ARRL clean sweep mug My mug came through in one piece. But, last year's was broken. The packaging is rather suspect. 73 Jim K9JF > See the message to the CQ-Contest reflector below. > > I also got a rattling package containing two Sweepstakes mugs myself. > Opened > one up and the handle was in a number of pieces. The other one rattles > like > there are also many parts inside. Was planning on bringing them back to > Newington in May. > > Therefore assume that essentially everybody receiving a Sweepstakes mug > this > year also received one of these glue-it-yourself mug kits. > > I look at the packaging with disbelief. How could anybody expect something > that fragile to not break during shipment? The outside of the package was > in > perfect shape. > > ... and I used to complain that they sent me first-class copies of QEX and > NCJ in two separate envelopes postmarked the same day instead of putting > them in a single envelope. > > Expectations diminishing with time. > > 73, > > Dick Norton, N6AA > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:07 PM > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Broken ARRL clean sweep mug > To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> > > > My XYL (KC2OYY) scored a clean sweep in the November phone sweepstakes > contest. Since this was her first she wanted the clean sweep mug so we > ordered one. Lo and behold this week we found on our porch a box > delivered via Fedex. When we picked it up, it sounded like a bunch of > nuts and bolts inside. > > Opened it and it was the clean sweep mug, shattered into about 10 pieces. > > But what is remarkable is that the mug was not packed with any sort of > padding at all, not even brown paper. It was just thrown in a box, > label slapped on and sent off on its way. > > She's going to call ARRL on Monday but I find it really disappointing > that no one found it appropriate to pack such a fragile item with > care. > > I hope everyone else got their mugs in one piece. > > 73 > > Ryan, N2RJ > _______________________________________________ > CQ-Contest mailing list > CQ-Contest@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest >
participants (1)
-
Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ