Hi, Chris.
I certainly agree that the letter will be helpful to
us, and I am not surprised at the CYA language Ms. Froetscher
included. My concern was raised by Joel's statement that "NSC shares our
position on distracted driving, especially in regards to the use of amateur
radio equipment". I wanted to be sure that was not an endoresment
of the recomendation contained in the closing
paragraphs of her letter. Dave's later reply let me know that
such is not our intent.
73,
Marty N6VI
Representing car-crazy SoCal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 6:32
AM
Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:18077] Re:National
Safety Council reply
Well, Marty, you have to focus on the operative term of the
letter, which is at the end of the third paragraph:
"Until such time as compelling, peer-reviewed scientific research is
presented that denotes significant risks associated with
the use of amateur radios, two-way radios, or other communications
devices, the NSC does not support legislative bans
or prohibition on their use."
That is a lot further than I expected them to go. Surely you can't
expect the President and CEO of the NSC to not cover herself after giving an
answer like that. The suggestion that amateur mobile operation should be
confined to emergency communications during
disasters is a suggestion for our own best practices document that they
recommend.
I think the letter is a home run for us, frankly.
73, Chris W3KD
Christopher D. Imlay
Booth, Freret, Imlay &
Tepper. P.C.
14356 Cape May Road
Silver Spring, Maryland
20904-6011
(301) 384-5525 telephone
(301) 384-6384
facsimile
W3KD@ARRL.ORG
-----Original Message-----
From:
Marty Woll <n6vi@socal.rr.com>
To: arrl-odv
<arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2009 2:45
am
Subject: [arrl-odv:18077] Re:National Safety Council reply
Hi, Joel.
While I'm pleased to learn that NSC is not looking to
promote laws prohibiting Amateur Radio mobile operation any time soon, I'm not
sure that discouraging mobile operation other than in "disaster emergencies"
is consistent with our - or at least my constituents' - position on the
use of Amateur equipment while driving. Some people can multi-task well
and others cannot. A blanket policy along the lines suggested by Ms.
Froetscher is, IMHO, not a suitable substitute for the exercise of
individual judgment and would be inapproriate.
73,
Marty N6VI
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:18
PM
Subject: FW: National Safety Council
reply