Thanks, Dave.
In reading the new bill, it parallels but does not mirror
the wording of S.1755, which passed the Senate last winter by unanimous
consent. The dates are merely updated from the version Ms.
Jackson-Lee introduced two years ago. Although the House and Senate bills
look essentially the same to us mortals, there was obviously some language that
had to be reconciled, leading to the opportunity for the Energy & Commerce
Committee to hold both bills hostage and kill them. Did
anyone suggest to the Congresswoman that she incorporate the Senate bill wording
so as to obviate the need for such reconciliation this time around?
If not, might we suggest that the companion Senate bill (not yet introduced, I
presume) adopt the wording of H.R.81 for the same reason? Or are we
dealing with the not-invented-here-and I-want-my-name-on-it
syndrome?
73,
Marty
Marty Woll N6VI
Vice-Director, ARRL Southwestern
Division
Ass't DEC, ARESLAX
BCUL 15 & Training Officer, LAFD
ACS
CERT III
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 12:36
PM
Subject: [arrl-odv:19541] H.R. 81
John Chwat reports that
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, the
original sponsor of H.R.2160 in the 111th Congress, has reintroduced the legislation in
the 112th
Congress. It has been given the number H.R.81 (attached).
Dave K1ZZ
<<H R 81.pdf>>