OK, well, let me see what we can do. Logistically, the changes you suggest are going to be somewhat difficult to get in, but we will try. I have some good supporting material that Dave Woolweaver and John Stratton came up with that I have to get into the record somehow so maybe we can put these points in as well. As to your point #2, CICs include Multiple Unit Dwellings if they are privately managed so the stat can't really be manipulated. And for point #3, I agree that municipalities do encourage and some enforce CC&Rs, but without a few anecdotal examples other than the one you note in D 037 I can't make much of that. Good points though, Marty. Let's see what we can do with them. Christopher D. Imlay Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper. P.C. 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011 (301) 384-5525 telephone (301) 384-6384 facsimile W3KD@ARRL.ORG -----Original Message----- From: Marty Woll <n6vi@socal.rr.com> To: Chris <w3kd@aol.com>; arrl-odv <arrl-odv@arrl.org> Cc: apitts <apitts@arrl.org>; lkustosik <lkustosik@arrl.org>; dhenderson <dhenderson@arrl.org> Sent: Tue, May 15, 2012 8:50 pm Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:20781] Re: FCC Docket 12-91; FCC Study of Amateur Radio Emergency Communications and Impediments to the Same Hi, Chris. My top four finds are: 1) There's a potentially powerful statistic in Section II - 37 that I believe should be included in the Executive summary, namely that over 80% of new housing construction is subject to private deed restrictions. 2) The statistic noted above is preceded by the statement in Section II - 36 that, "as of 1998, one out of eight Americans lived in private common-interest communities". That suggests that seven out of eight don't but ignores the great number - perhaps a majority - that live in apartments or other rental units. This statement in isolation may do more harm than good. 3) Some cities require (see D #037) or encourage private deed restrictions as an alternative to detailed municipal zoning regulations, effectively bypassing the intent of PRB-1. This fact could bolster our discussion of the pervasiveness of private deed restrictions and/or of the scope of PRB-1. 4) One important reason Hams are constrained in their housing choices is proximity to adequate medical care (a hot topic in federal circles), but I don't find that mentioned anywhere in our discussion of housing alternatives / choices. This could be incorporated into document page 25 (pdf page 28) among other places. The rest consists of minor grammatical nits that are of no real consequence. 73, Marty N6VI ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris To: Marty Woll ; arrl-odv@arrl.org Cc: apitts@arrl.org ; lkustosik@arrl.org ; dhenderson@arrl.org Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 4:41 PM Subject: [arrl-odv:20781] Re: FCC Docket 12-91; FCC Study of Amateur Radio Emergency Communications and Impediments to the Same Marty, sad to say it really is too late. I am way out of position now for miscellaneous edits. Are these major concerns? 73, Chris W3KD Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone Marty Woll <n6vi@socal.rr.com> wrote:
Chris and all involved:
Thank you for your efforts in producing such a comprehensive and detail-filled response to the FCC inquiry. If you are open to edits at this late stage, let me know and I'll forward them separately. If not, I understand.
73,
Marty N6VI
arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv