Rgr, Jim. Tnx. 73, Rick - K5UR -----Original Message----- From: arrl-odv@arrl.org To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:10:25 -0400 Subject: RE: [arrl-odv:12126] Re: The EC Allocation by Bandwidth Proposal Rick, Good question. My sense about the level of member support for this is from the folks who approach me at meetings and hamfests. I have no definitive data. When I receive comments they most typically indicate the person is confused, at best. The second most prevalent comment is that they don’t want things to be messed with. The comments from pro-change folks is far down the list. Jim Weaver, K8JE Director, Great Lakes Division ARRL; http://www.arrl.org/ 5065 Bethany Rd., Mason, OH 45040 Tel.: 513-459-0142; E-mail: k8je@arrl.org ARRL: The reason Amateur Radio Is! MEMBERS: The reason ARRL Is! -----Original Message----- From: arrl-odv@arrl.org [mailto:arrl-odv@arrl.org] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:26 AM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:12126] Re: The EC Allocation by Bandwidth Proposal Jim: What do you base the comment on below? I'm getting very few comments about the proposal and those few that I have gotten are by far in favor of it. 73, K5UR In a message dated 4/20/2005 10:39:50 PM Central Standard Time, arrl-odv@arrl.org writes: I have to admit there seem to be relatively few members who are ready to accept the basics of our band plan proposal at this time.