Just label the published ones “Draft”.  Once approved, that label can be removed on the Web site version.

Marty N6VI

From: arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:02 AM
To: Ahrens, Cliff, K0CA
Cc: G Widin; arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:22417] Re: Fwd: ARRL Board Meeting Minutes

I wouldn’t have chosen the word “official.” To that extent I agree with you, Cliff.

Dave

From: Ahrens, Cliff, K0CA
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:55 PM
To: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ
Cc: G Widin; arrl-odv
Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:22410] Fwd: ARRL Board Meeting Minutes

As I mentioned, I don't think we should introduce any delay in publishing the minutes. I'm in total agreement with promptly publishing the minutes.  But the news release you cite includes a link to the "Official Minutes."  Maybe we should expedite our approval process so that they can be truly considered "official" while at the same time insuring that the board has approved them as accurately reflecting the actions of the board. 

Cliff K0CA