The HF symbol rate decision is on an entirely separate timetable from those raised in the Further Notice. Assuming that the Report and Order is adopted on Nov. 15, the rules change will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Publication can take a few days, but sometimes there are delays for non-substantive reasons. Dave From: "Boehner, James, N2ZZ (Dir, RK)" <n2zz@arrl.org> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 5:34 PM To: "david@davidsiddall-law.com" <david@davidsiddall-law.com>, "arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org" <arrl-odv@arrl.org> Subject: RE: FCC Proposed Action on Symbol Rate Removal David, Question- Does this mean that if the FCC brings this up and adopts it on Nov 15 (for deletion of the symbol rate for HF), the rule change will immediately be placed in the federal register and be active after 30 days? Or will their inquiry process for the LF, VHF and UHF bands be necessary before anything is done? ‘73 de Jim N2ZZ Director – Roanoke Division Representing ARRL members in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia ARRL – the national association for Amateur Radio Facebook Page: ARRL Roanoke Division Website: www.arrl-roanoke.org<http://www.arrl-roanoke.org/> [Text, logo Description automatically generated] From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> On Behalf Of david davidsiddall-law.com Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 11:53 AM To: arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org <arrl-odv@arrl.org> Subject: [arrl-odv:35293] FCC Proposed Action on Symbol Rate Removal All, The FCC has released the proposed text of the item that it will consider on Nov. 15. If adopted, the FCC would: * Delete the HF symbol rate * Adopt a 2.8 kHz bandwidth limit in place of the symbol rate * Leave all other rules in place, including: * prohibition of encrypted modes * small subbands for unattended (automatic) digital modes with bandwidths greater than 500 Hz * Initiate a new Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in which it: * Proposes to eliminate the symbol rates for 6 meters and up * Request comment on the signal bandwidth limits already applicable in those bands * Request comment on eliminating the symbol rate limits applicable to the LF bands, and whether a bandwidth limit is necessary in those bands Link to the proposed Commission item: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-397992A1.pdf. * The proposed Report and Order, which relates to the HF symbol rate, is 100 percent consistent with ARRL positions and advocacy. * The Further Notice makes proposals that also are consistent with ARRL’s recent advocacy on these issues. As always, feel free to direct any questions to me. 73, Dave K3ZJ David R. Siddall Managing Partner DS Law, PLLC 1629 K St. NW, Ste 300 Washington, DC 20006 direct: +1 202 559 4690 Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited. This e-mail is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email and its attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all electronic and physical copies of the e-mail message and its attachments. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of attorney-client or any other privilege. Thank you.
