I will sure do that, Kay, but I don't put much stock in rumors about Comm Act changes; those rumors surface at the beginning (or before) of each new Congress session. But we can surely enough do a "wish" list and a "watch out" list. Christopher D. Imlay Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper. P.C. 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011 (301) 384-5525 telephone (301) 384-6384 facsimile W3KD@ARRL.ORG -----Original Message----- From: Kay Craigie <n3kn@verizon.net> To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Mon, Jul 26, 2010 10:21 am Subject: [arrl-odv:19214] Communications Act revision Dan Henderson was in Gettysburg over the weekend for the annual meeting of he NCVEC and had a chat with Bill Cross. Here is what Dan wrote about that onversation: "Cross and I spoke Friday after his presentation to the NCVEC and he shared hat the revision of the Communications Act of 96 is definitely front burner or action in the 112th Congress. Says the backroom meetings between the ommission and Committee staff have already started. He said make sure our ants/concerns are ready and that even if there is a change in leadership his seems to be a "get it done" issue for the next session. FWIW." By "change in leadership" I take it Cross means a change in the majority arty of one or both houses of Congress rather than a change in leadership t the FCC. 1996 is a long time ago and I just don't remember how the ARRL dealt with he last revision of the Communications Act. Dave, Brennan, and Chris -- would you please start putting some thoughts ogether to be provided to the Board as the starting point for discussions? 73 - Kay N3KN