Jack Najork, W5FG has made a considerable investment in postage stamps to share his views on the importance of accurate signal reports. His most recent letter dated April 28 quotes me selectively, so I thought I should share the complete text of my earlier response to him on Joel's behalf. Obviously, he is making a mountain out of a molehill but bear in mind that he's 88 years old. Dave K1ZZ April 21, 2008 Jack Najork, W5FG 2517 Hiwy 31 Hubbard, TX 76648 Dear Jack: President Harrison has asked me to acknowledge your letter of March 31. Thanks for sharing your thoughts about accurate signal reports. Swapping "59" or "599" does seem a bit silly. The essential piece of information being exchanged in a DX contact is the callsign of each station, but there is a longstanding convention that an additional element of information also must be exchanged in order for a contact to have taken place. For ARRL awards this additional element does not have to be a signal report. It's debatable whether sending a standard signal report that may or may not be accurate rises to the level of a moral or ethical issue. One also might argue that when there are many stations wanting to make a contact, the objective should be to complete each contact as quickly as possible in order to maximize the rate. When pulling callsigns out of a big pileup it is often impossible to gauge the strength of each individual signal. When the pace isn't as frantic there is less excuse for rubber-stamp signal reports. Perhaps your experience is different, but mine is that except for pileups and contests most operators do make an attempt to send an honest report. Thanks again for giving the ARRL officers and directors the benefit of your thoughts. Sincere 73, David Sumner, K1ZZ Chief Executive Officer