Chris
First of all, thanks for the memo regarding Riley's retirement and his
replacement. I was waiting to see if anyone else jumped in with
comments but I didn't see any so I'll throw in my two cents with a little
background.
Before Richard Lee stepped up to reinstate actual enforcement it was a
total mess. When I was president it was THE most pressing issue
that the ARRL had to deal with. Whether at ARRL forums, individual
letters, emails etc by a wide margin the primary concern of members was
getting the FCC to enforce the amateur rules. I certainly hope we
don't go back to that situation because it was really, really
discouraging. Not a board meeting, committee meeting or EC
meeting went by when we didn't spend a rather large part of the meeting
discussing how we could get the FCC engaged in amateur enforcement.
Thank goodness Richard Lee heard our continuous pleas for help.
We took the view that at every opportunity and at every meeting with the
FCC, amateur enforcement was an issue that we addressed. Finally,
our persistence paid off. However, with the passage of time, it is
easy to forget how long and difficult the road was to get to where we
were when Riley took over the enforcement function. I know several
people who were around during that time can remember we actually had
something called the "Enforcement Task Force" that was for
brain-storming ideas to draw the FCC back to enforcement.
Chris, I know you will keep us informed of the progress of selecting
someone to fill Riley's position. I for one will be very
interested. I hope everyone on the Board will cause it is an
important issue to the ARRL and to the amateur community.
73, Rod W6ROD
At 05:40 AM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
MEMORANDUM
To:
ARRL ODV -- Confidential
From:
Chris Imlay, W3KD
Re:
Riley Hollingsworth Retirement and Replacement Issue
Date:
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />June 26,
2008
Greetings. I wanted to bring you up to date on the Riley
Hollingsworth replacement issue, because it seems to be a problem in the
making, and because it is going in an entirely different direction than
Riley allowed us to believe.
Riley
is retiring July 3. This is not news. He told us this on April 28. But at
that time, when Riley announced for the second and obviously now final
time that he was retiring, he had led us to understand that his
replacement was his “hand-picked” colleague, Bill Knowles-Kellett. He
said that Bill would almost certainly be his replacement and wanted the
job. I had met Bill on an earlier occasion in Gettysburg and he is
certainly competent to take Riley’s place. Bill is not a ham, but was
experienced in land mobile radio enforcement issues, which are not
significantly different from ours. Riley said that Bill was interested in
the job and was going to get a ham license as part of the deal. Riley
also said that he would not retire unless he was certain that the
enforcement program would continue unabated as he had been doing it. He
claimed he had the requisite assurances that this would occur.
Then
things started to change. Riley said that the Enforcement Bureau would
have to post the job publicly, and that Riley was worried that the job
would be moved to Washington. If that happened, Riley said that he was
concerned that the job would be diluted, and that the person that
replaced him might be tasked with a significant number of other
enforcement obligations and that Amateur Radio enforcement might take a
back seat.
Riley
had suggested that we meet with his boss in the Enforcement Division,
Kathy Berthot, Chief of the Spectrum Enforcement Division. I met with her
(and with George Dillon, a colleague of Riley’s at FCC in Washington)
in May, and made a strong pitch that Riley’s work be continued
unabated. I also mentioned that while I understood that Bill
Knowles-Kellett was interested in the job, and we would be satisfied with
Bill, we couldn’t attempt to tell the Commission how to run its
ship and had no intention of attempting to do so. However, our concern
was that the enforcement program in the Amateur Service had validated our
strong belief that a very small bit of deterrence in Amateur Radio
enforcement is sufficient and necessary, and that we were adamant that
the program that Riley has been administering must continue without
substantial change. I received hearty assurances from both Kathy and
George that they agreed with that. They said that the job had to be
posted, and that the resolution of that was out of their hands. We have
since learned that the Chairman’s office micromanages all hiring of
even the lowest level staff, and that no assurances can be given by
anyone at the Bureau level at FCC about any hiring decisions.
After
that meeting, strong interest in the job was expressed by Laura Smith, a
lady who had worked in the past for ITA (now EWA, the Enterprise Wireless
Alliance) the former Industrial Telecommunications Association, a land
mobile association. She was known to me as an administrative person, but
very knowledgeable about land mobile radio regulation. She left ITA and
moved, as it turns out, to Carlisle, PA, about 45 minutes from
Gettysburg, with her husband, and she is now doing freelance work or
contract work from her home in Carlisle for the land mobile lawyers at
the Shulman, Rogers law firm in Rockville, MD. She heard of Riley’s job
and lobbied hard to get it. Riley and Bill called me to “sell” ARRL
on Laura, who at the time seemed to be the front runner for the job. She
may still be for all I know. Bill’s being as vocal about it as he was
made me think that he didn’t have any interest in the job himself, if
indeed he ever really did.
The
situation deteriorated further when the job was posted. It was posted as
a GS-15 job, which has a salary range of between $115K and $145K per year
or thereabouts, so it is a pretty spiffy job for anyone who wants it. But
it was posted as being “in the Washington area”. Riley thinks this is
broad enough to include Gettysburg, but I don’t. I am afraid that it
will be a D.C. job and that Riley’s fear about the job being diluted is
very real. It is not unreasonable for them to post this job, but
Riley’s assurances to us have largely been shown to be unreliable so
far.
ARRL
went out with its own news release about this job, essentially soliciting
anyone with a ham license and a law degree to apply. This is not
necessarily a good strategy, because there are some hams with law degrees
in the Washington area that would not do a great job replacing Riley, but
who might want the job due to the salary level. On the other hand, a ham
would be better in this job than a non-ham. It is unclear what the status
is of the continued interest of Laura Smith.
So,
while we have very little input into this process and no control at all,
we will have to keep the pressure on the Enforcement Bureau to continue
the enforcement program unabated, and perhaps it is timely to remind Kris
Monteith, the EB Chief (who probably is not overly warm and fuzzy with us
now since Joel and I gave her a very difficult meeting about the BPL
matter awhile back) that we have high expectations for Riley’s
replacement.
Your thoughts on this subject are welcome. I believe that this is a very
high priority issue, and I bet Rod Stafford does as well, since it was on
his watch as ARRL President that we returned from the dark times of no
Amateur enforcement at all, and the difference has been amazing.
Incidentally, contrary to what you will read on ARRL’s web site, it was
not Riley who brought Amateur Radio enforcement back; it was
Richard Lee, who has now faded into obscurity at FCC due to some whistle
blowing he did (quite properly), but before Rich fell from grace at FCC,
he resurrected Amateur Radio enforcement single handedly, and put Riley
into the job (after Rich did it himself for a time, and very effectively,
I might add).
73, Chris W3KD
Christopher D. Imlay
BOOTH, FRERET, IMLAY & TEPPER, P.C.
14356 Cape May Road
Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011
(301) 384-5525 telephone
(301) 384-6384 facsimile
W3KD@ARRL.ORG
Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, &
more!
Rod Stafford W6ROD
Photos:
www.flickr.com/photos/rodstaffordphotography