Thanks, Dave. 

That was well before the AREDN project was launched in San Diego and perhaps before the BBHN group in Texas turned its attention from old Linksys routers to the newer Ubiquiti hardware platforms.  Apparently no one knew at the time to bring the software-mod issue to our attention.  In any case, the inclusion of flexibility comments as Chris suggested is appropriate.

Sorry for the bandwidth (no pun intended) on this issue, but it has become a hot topic among some members.  When the League releases a story concerning our filing of comments, it may be helpful to include a few words of explanation as to what rules changed when.

73,

Marty N6VI

From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 5:49 AM
To: Woll, Marty, N6VI; Imlay, Chris, W3KD; Mileshosky, Brian, N5ZGT
Cc: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:24716] Re: Draft agenda for October 3 EC Meeting

Marty, that proceeding was Docket 13-49. The ARRL publicized the proceeding and filed comments at the time. Our principal focus was on 5850-5925 MHz.

Dave