To make my views open, pre-vote or whatever...I'm agin' the bill. 73/Greg W7OZ -----Original Message----- From: Frank Fallon [mailto:n2ff@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 12:10 PM To: arrl-odv Subject: [arrl-odv:12816] Re: NWS - Senate Bill 786 Dave, I propose we take a vote to oppose S 786 (The NWS Bill) either by the full board or the EC. I think it would be more PC if the full board voted unanimously to oppose it. And then play up up on web site. Frank...N2FF..... W3KD@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 7/25/2005 12:44:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, dsumner@arrl.org writes:
It would have been difficult for the EC to discuss S.786 on April 9, as it was introduced on April 14.
Like Kay, I think Chris was thinking of HR 298 and HR 1183.
Dave
Whoops, I was, Sorry. And my comments on Chwat's views were with respect to 298 and 1183. Not enough coffee this AM, sorry.
Per Emily Latella, "Never Mind".
Chris