I disagree. My members are saying the exact opposite. I strongly oppose this position. 73 Ria N2RJ On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:48 AM Richard Norton via arrl-odv < arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
As reported on September 25 in message ODV-31049, I had an interchange with an Arizona ARRL member regarding the League's HOA legislative activity. My reply to him, covering the lobbying history, was included. This is a follow-on report covering interchange with more League members on HOA-related legislation lobbying.
*Executive Summary*
I saw no support for the League continuing the HOA-related congressional lobbying effort. If the extent and cost of our activity is explained, some even expressed irritation with our effort, essentially saying that people should read and pay attention to what they sign.
*Details*
I forwarded my message with mention of thirty years of lobbying and the seven-figure cost to two groups of Radio Amateurs totaling fewer than 100, asking for their comments. The first group consisted of some radio contesting friends located all across the country, and the second group contained ham radio leaders in the Southwestern Division such as SM's, club presidents, and representatives to the Council of Radio Clubs. Responses were received via emails. Discussion also took place at a Zoom meeting of the Los Angeles Area Council of Radio Clubs.
The responses were unanimous in their appreciation for receiving the information and not supporting further lobbying efforts.
Among comments such as "outstanding," "excellent," and "well-written" was the suggestion to "make it a guest editorial."
The most positive thing said about the lobbying was that it was OK to have tried, but it is time to move on to something else.
Some gave histories of their experiences in HOAs. In all cases, people understood what they signed up for and worked with it, not expecting someone to come in and absolve them of their promises.
Support was given to assisting amateurs with conflicts with government, but not with private contracts.
*Suggestions*
In formulating your actions on this subject, it may be useful for you to communicate with League members. If you do so, it would be pertinent to include the following two facts that are important in deciding whether to continue:
1) thirty years of lobbying 2) seven-figure cost to date
If in the end, anyone feels continuation is advisable, I'd appreciate hearing any proposed strategy, not just that you think it would be nice if it happens. Why is the legislation at all likely to be enacted now? Why should we be spending $100K+ a year on it?
*Preferred Activity*
A program, consisting of QST stories about specific successful HOA installations and HOA club-stations, eventually resulting in a book about dealing with HOAs, seems worthy of consideration. I'll continue to try to get something like this underway.
I'd be happy to distribute my original message more widely, asking for more member input, but hope the Board will act without my doing so.
*Conclusion*
The Southwestern Division has spoken loudly to me. There is no support for the League to continue the HOA-related congressional lobbying effort. It is time for something else.
All hams that I've discussed this with from other divisions feel the same.
Let's attach our ground wires, and work on a plan that has a chance of succeeding.
73,
Dick, N6AA
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv