While I stand second to no one on the thought that New England is the best place in the world to be in July, I’m OK with Denver this one time.

 

BTW, other good months to be in New England are January, December, February, November, March, October, April, September, May, August, and June.

 

Fred Hopengarten, Esq.   K1VR

Six Willarch Road

Lincoln, MA 01773

781.259.0088, k1vr@arrl.org

 

New England Director

cid:a4a12f0b-0468-4a39-b953-31b2a3da8564

Serving ME, NH, VT, MA, RI and CT

 

 

 

From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Mark J Tharp
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 8:55 PM
To: Rod Stafford
Cc: arrl-odv; Michael Ritz
Subject: [arrl-odv:32121] Re: Covid, "the shot" and Connecticut in July

 

One upside to Denver is NOT having to go via ORD  :) 

Downside to Denver, is the new BOD members and the rest of us miss out on the one on ones with staff as Mike noted. I have to imagine the logistics are also harder being in Denver for any committee meetings that typically take place the day before. We are all very capable of doing this remote, but nothing takes the place of face to face discussion. 

 

Just my piddly .03 from the back row. 

 

Mark, HDX 

 

 

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:46 PM Rod Stafford <w6rod@comcast.net> wrote:

I like a 2 hour flight to Denver!  Rod

Amateur Radio W6ROD

ARRL Int’l Affairs Vice President



On Mar 10, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net> wrote:



Personally, I would rather meet in CT, but only for the reason that I would be able to have meetings with some of the staff members in person while I am there.  

 

Keep in mind that while we were in Denver we were divided into three separate rooms, not one large one.  I did like the fact that there were other meal options within easy walking distance from the hotel. 

 

73;
Mike
W7VO

On 03/10/2021 3:44 PM w3tom--- via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:

 

 

I understand that currently the Winsor solution that I suggested is not available, therefore I think that if Denver is available at this late date it should be considered for our July in person/virtual hybrid Meeting. As Ria mentioned, the setup in Denver was ideal…

 

73, Tom – W3TOM

 

From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> On Behalf Of David Norris via arrl-odv
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 5:13 PM
To: w3tom@verizon.net
Cc: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Subject: [arrl-odv:32117] Re: Covid, "the shot" and Connecticut in July

 

I too thought Denver worked very well in August. That wouldn’t be a bad choice for an July in person/virtual hybrid meeting. 

 

73 

David A. Norris, K5UZ

Director, Delta Division

 

Sent from my iPhone

 

On Mar 10, 2021, at 2:56 PM, w3tom--- via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrlorg> wrote:

 

Traditionally our venue at Windsor has only utilized ½ of much larger room. May it be possible to enlarge our meeting room at Windsor to provide safe space by opening the room dividing folding doors?  

 

73, Tom – W3TOM

 

From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> On Behalf Of rjairam@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 12:27 PM
To: W2RU - ARRL <W2RU@arrl.org>
Cc: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Subject: [arrl-odv:32114] Re: Covid, "the shot" and Connecticut in July

 

I agree with Bud on this.

 

The setup in Denver was ideal I think. 

 

With that in mind, are we really married to Windsor for the next meeting? If another venue can provide better safety measures I wouldn’t mind going there instead.

 

Ria

N2RJ 

 

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:14 PM W2RU - ARRL <W2RU@arrl.org> wrote:

I agree with Kermit, but I would not make planning a hybrid meeting “conditional” on anything — I suggest that any in-person July Board and Committee meetings should be planned and implemented as hybrid meetings from the beginning.  Far easier and safer to let some remote-participation electronics gear sit idle than to attempt to jerry-rig a hybrid set-up at the last minute.  (Yes, I understand there is a cost associated with a hybrid set-up.)  Also, for the time being, at least, I believe microphones at an in-person meeting should not be shared.

 

Bud, W2RU 

 



On Mar 10, 2021, at 10:11 AM, Kermit Carlson via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:

 

Hello ALL -

 

         I do agree that the shot will provide a path forward to allow

controlled group gatherings with vaccinated individuals. Similarly

I plan to be vaccinated as soon as possible - but there might be some

people who are on the shot-clock after long-term symptoms of infections,

who for medical reasons will be delayed in obtaining the vaccinations. 

 

         I do happen to be in that group and the advice that I have been

given for a possible timeline might allow for the two-week wait until

full efficacy after the second application of the Pfizer vaccine.  If in

my case that timeline does not hold and for anyone else similarly unable

to travel to Newington then I certainly would demand that the technical

details of a hybrid meeting be implemented.

 

             Best Regards,

 

                                   73, Kermit Carlson W9XA

 

 

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv


Virus-free. www.avast.com