I approve the minutes as corrected.

73 de Mike N2YBB

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 10:01 AM

To: Lisenco, Mike (Dir, HU) ; arrl-odv

Subject: [arrl-odv:26190] Re: Vote to approve the minutes of the January 2017 Annual Meeting of the ARRL Board of Directors

Word “original” has been added to the minute.

Dan Henderson, N1ND

Assistant Secretary – American Radio Relay League, Inc.

Regulatory Information Manager

ARRL, the national association for Amateur Radio

860-594-0236

dhenderson@arrl.org

From: Lisenco, Mike (Dir, HU)
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 9:46 AM
To: Henderson, Dan N1ND <dhenderson@arrl.org>; arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Subject: Re: [arrl-odv:26185] Vote to approve the minutes of the January 2017 Annual Meeting of the ARRL Board of Directors

The last edit is confusing. Mr. Norton’s amendment failed, but the statement reads as if it was passed after not receiving a second.

Perhaps it should read:

“Mr. Norton moved that the motion be amended to include “So that the members are aware of the issues involved, the report of the Reapportionment Committee will be published.” The amendment did not receive a second, and therefore failed. After discussion, the original motion was ADOPTED.”

Or something to that effect.

73 de Mike N2YBB

From: Henderson, Dan N1ND

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 9:38 AM

To: arrl-odv

Subject: [arrl-odv:26185] Vote to approve the minutes of the January 2017 Annual Meeting of the ARRL Board of Directors

Per Standing Order 11-2.18, as amended in July 2016, I am calling for a vote on the minutes of the January 2017 Annual Meeting of the ARRL Board of Directors.

A final version of the minutes is attached. Note there were 3 small additional edits received this morning. Two related to typos in Minute 7 and 23. The third reverses the order two items also in Minute 23, so that it now reads (as verified by listening to the tapes) as:

“Mr. Norton moved that the motion be amended to include “So that the members are aware of the issues involved, the report of the Reapportionment Committee will be published”, but the motion did not receive a second. After discussion the motion was ADOPTED.”