If it wasn't clear
the first time, I AGREE with you, OM !
ZN
In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:44:02 AM Eastern Standard Time,
w5zn@arrl.org writes:
I do,
however, wholeheartedly agree with your comment that this has very little to
do with bandwidth regulation but is a separate and much broader issue we
will have to address in the near future. We need to start planning in that
area and that is where we need to involve Riley, rather than another ARRL
paid vacation to HQ.
Well, whatever. The point is, there doesn't
seem to exist a plan to replace his job function, and that is a real problem,
given his M.O. which has worked reasonably well over time. I don't see any
alternative to the deterrence concept, and that requires an FCC face person
and some visibility.
chris