Thank you for the clarification. Ria N2RJ On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 12:48, Rod Blocksome <rod.blocksome@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ria, Yes, that was a reason stated to the E&E in this case. 73, Rod, K0DAS
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:40 AM rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rod,
“A Director, believing that rescinding the Code of Conduct at the January board meeting lifted the prohibition of directors filing such comments, filed formal comments to FCC Proceeding CG RM-11828 - ARRL’s Entry Level Licensing proposal. Later he realized it was a violation of board policy 2.2 and promptly notified E&E.”
Just so we are clear, was this the reason (code of conduct) stated to the E&E by the director who made the comment?
I ask because from what I understand that the policy 2.2 for board members not to comment on FCC proposals pre-dates the code of conduct. Therefore this wouldn’t even apply.
Regards Ria, N2RJ
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 11:31 AM Rod Blocksome <rod.blocksome@gmail.com> wrote:
Arrl-Odv, Attached are Reports from the E&E Committee and the Historical Committee. Drop me an email if you have any questions. 73, Rod, K0DAS _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv