Jim your member is, in my view, quite correct. There is a substantial difference, actually several, between what is on the mybackgroundcheck.com web site for ARC partner organizations and what ARC told Joel they were going to use. We are revising Joel's letter to the ARC now, but in my view, all is not well with the background check issue. 73, Chris W3KD Christopher D. Imlay BOOTH, FRERET, IMLAY & TEPPER, P.C. 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011 (301) 384-5525 telephone (301) 384-6384 facsimile W3KD@ARRL.ORG -----Original Message----- From: K8JE <K8JE@arrl.org> To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:06 pm Subject: [arrl-odv:16853] FW: Membership misconceptions Oops! I’ve attached the member comment this time. The following is a comment I received from a member in the GLD. Knowing that the background check issue has clearly not been resolved, but that ARRL releases have sounded much more “enthusiastic” than the situation warrants, how does anyone suggest I respond to this and other such comments other than with the unvarnished truth? Jim Incidentally, the member’s comment was in response to comments I made about the RC background check demands and the status of the MOU. “I also recently read that the issues with arrl/rc had been resolved to everyone's satisfaction. I did not verify this but suggest you check it out currently.” Jim Weaver, K8JE, Director ARRL Great Lakes Division 5065 Bethany Rd. Mason, OH 45040 E-mail: k8je@arrl.org; Tel.: 513-459-0142 ARRL - The Reason Amateur Radio Is! Members - The Reason ARRL Is!