While I detest the
deceit and delaying tactics employed by Sen. Nelson and his staff, let us please
caution our members not to descend into profanity – or, worse yet, threats – in
any correspondence or contact they may choose to initiate with the
Senator. We all have some hotheads in our respective Divisions, and we
don’t want them to poison the well or tarnish our “brand”.
Separately, what was the
total out-of-pocket cost of this two-year effort, including any incremental
billings for professional services?
73,
Marty
N6VI
From: arrl-odv
[mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Raisbeck
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 10:21 AM
To:
n2ybb@arrl.org; arrl-odv@arrl.org
Subject: [arrl-odv:25999] Re:
Meeting with Senator Nelson's staff
Mike,
I would
suggest that your report below be "leaked" to the ham community in some
form. A little bit of grassroots wrath directed at Senator Nelson can't
hurt at this point, and might help in the longer
term.
Mike
K1TWF
On
12/08/16, Mike Lisenco N2YBB<n2ybb@arrl.org>
wrote:
Hello ODV
Chris Imlay, Frank McCarthy and I met on Tuesday morning
with Senator Nelson's Chief of Staff along with two Commerce Committee senior
attorneys who work for Nelson as he is the ranking minority member of the
Committee) We have met with both of the two staff attorneys repeatedly before).
We were attempting to persuade Nelson to release the hold he (and apparently he
alone) has placed on H.R. 1301 or the composite Senate Bill that includes a
number of minor telecom bills that passed the House.
I am sorry to have to report that the Amateur Radio Parity
Act will not pass this Session. Nelson's Chief of Staff claims in effect that
Nelson has heard from an unspecified number of HOAs in Florida who are opposed
to the Bill. They can't tell us why there is this alleged opposition to the
modified Bill; whether the opposition is based on a reasonable argument; and we
have never been told before Tuesday that this alleged opposition exists.
Nelson's Chief of Staff could articulate no reason why the current Bill does not
accommodate HOAs, protect "contracts" or requires further modification.
Quite frankly, it is apparent to both Chris and myself that
Senator Nelson had no intention whatsoever of changing his position. We believe
that we were sandbagged from the start of the meeting. This despite the fact
that Nelson has sent responses to the hams who have contacted him that he
appreciates the value of ham radio and the services we provide and that he is
open to a reasonable compromise that takes into account the concerns of hams and
HOAs.
Instead of coming out and saying to our face at the get-go
that they wouldn’t let the bill move forward, they first implied that since
we’ve only had this bill moving through one Congressional term, that we
essentially haven’t been around long enough -- we haven’t paid our
dues so to speak.
They broached the subject of The Villages, the largest HOA
in Florida. We were ready for that. When we informed them that The
Villages has a large and very active Amateur Radio club that provides much
service to the community, they changed tactics and instead asked if we had
contacted any local Florida HOAs, as they were receiving some letters from local
Homeowners' Associations. We asked if they had also received the
thousands of emails, letters, and phone calls from our members. They said
yes and then they quickly changed tactics. They asked if we had contacted all
the Florida HOAs and the "Association of Florida Homeowners' Associations" Of
course we hadn't; we negotiated a compromise with the only national organization
representing HOAs nationwide. We also noted that we had never heard of a Florida
Assocation of HOAs. As it turns out, there is no such organization. We asked for
contacts for all of the opponents of the current bill. That evening, one of the
Commerce Committee attorneys referred us to a lobbyist for the local Florida CAI
chapter. This is ludicrous, since we already have an agreement with CAI and a
letter from the organization supporting the modified Bill.
The bottom line is that they delayed agreeing to meet with
us until a time in which we were boxed in with nowhere to go for this
year. We are so very close. There are options for us for next year,
which the Keelen Group will brief the Board about in January, and we need to
continue on our pursuit of this bill, as well as maintain a presence on Capitol
Hill as we have developed a brand in Congress.
I ask that the Board continue its support of our
legislative advocacy for the upcoming year.
73 de Mike
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mike Lisenco, N2YBB
Director, Hudson Division
Chairman, ad hoc
Legislative Advocacy Committee
ARRL - The national association for Amateur
Radio™
917-865-3538
n2ybb@arrl.org
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv
mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv