Last Friday we received a response to our FOIA request to
the FCC for the redacted material from the BPL proceeding.
Dave and the
staff have been reviewing the material and there are some very interesting
details contained in it. Attached are some tidbits.
In one place a report is discussing the fact that the
measured emissions from a Main.net device exceeded the Part 15 limit. In the
redacted report the statement reads:
“If distance scaling were
based on distance to the pole ground wire rather than the nearest part of the
BPL system [portion deleted] measurements would have passed with 1 dB margin at
the selected quasi-peak measurement location”
What was deleted? The
following parenthetical comment: “(a suggestion made by Main.Net’s CTO, but
which we consider to be invalid),” In other words, the statement was
retained but the fact that the FCC staff thought it was invalid was
deleted.
We now know – and can show the world – why Judge Tatel stated in
his concurring opinion, “…there is little doubt that the Commission deliberately
attempted to exclude from the record evidence adverse to its position.” You can
certainly see why the FCC didn't rely on the information contained in this
slide.
Also attached are the documents that the FCC uploaded to the
ECFS on their web site. This is now all public. Interestingly, the cover sheets
identifying each test were NOT scanned in, so it is very confusing which test is
which. This was obviously intentional. These are the bulk of the studies that we
got on paper, however. File #1 is just Chris's cover letter.
The staff is
preparing a story for ARRLWeb and we obviously will publicize this
widely!
To quote Riley Hollingsworth from a few weeks ago "The ARRL held the FCC's feet to the fire on the science, and proved they let politics override sound engineering!"
I am sending info in two files since some of the attachments are large. First set attached.
73 Joel W5ZN